
What was I going to do with it?
[TW]Fox;15632770 said:It was all about getting the lowest userID.
It was, thus, a day of much victory.


Some of us were lucky and were pre-registered, I was number 20 until my account broke and the only fix anyone could suggest was to delete it and re-register me. After that we discovered that it was actually down to a bouncing email address so could have easily been resolved. Boooooo![]()

So yeah as we were saying on new years day, pre-nuke over here.
Was old to start with, now ancient. Takes me several days/weeks to type a post, by then often the thread is old.
Can I claim "steadiest poster" award?
**goes to toilet using zimmer frame**

Some of us were lucky and were pre-registered, I was number 20 until my account broke and the only fix anyone could suggest was to delete it and re-register me. After that we discovered that it was actually down to a bouncing email address so could have easily been resolved. Boooooo![]()

Well... the way in looked kind of like this:
![]()
And you can browse OCUK main page from 2000 onwards in internet archives
![]()
) ). aahhh the days before the magic AXIA chips 
I wonder how long a similar unit would take if you could fully utilise all threads on an decenly overclocked i7 ????That's what happens when people win charity auctions for post counts.

(It might have been the other way round but I think it was as above).
in 2008....one thing i do miss tho...is the legend himself....
is UOcUK going ?