Cassius Clarke said:20-22k would get you a 996 porsche 911, why settle for second best ?
[TW]Fox said:Not one worth having it wouldn't. You need more for a decent 911.
Rotty said:exactly, that picture is very misleading , it ain't known as smurf blue for nothing![]()
Tax Evader said:Oi! Less of the SmurfismI had one for 18 months and it was lubbly jubbly
![]()
Unpainted Silver is the one to avoid![]()
Toast said:the one in the infamous 'overtaking a Maestro' video?![]()
Tax Evader said:Oi! Less of the SmurfismI had one for 18 months and it was lubbly jubbly
![]()
Toast said:a short clip of the Smurf M3, passenger view, blasting past what looks like a Maestro![]()
Tax Evader said:Hmm ok, not too flattering then eh... even a walking drunk blind man with a broken stick and an ill dog could blast past austin's finest junk!![]()
Toast said:I can't find the vid now![]()
Steve said:Now I have just gone and confused myself
I know the cams on some of the 2002-2004 speed 6 engines can be doddy if they weren't changed but I am seriously in love. I can't stop thinking about it![]()
4.0 Tuscan S
390 bhp
0-60 3.8 sec
60-0 2.5 sec
195+ MPH top end
No nanny controls/limiters etc
Dry sump
Oh and to finish it off it is £120 CHEAPER a year to insure than my e36 M3!!!!!
You can all say I am mad now![]()
offended that he would rather have a real car than a german nanny?Vanilla said:It's made of plastic. Bus stop seat plastic.
Get the M3.
I'm disgusted, actually offended that you'd go for that over the M3. I am upset and must lie down.
NightSt@lk3r said:offended that he would rather have a real car than a german nanny?