Love Britain ? - Vote UKIP.

Status
Not open for further replies.
presumably if we started to restrict free movement of people into the uk and restrict work..other countries would be free to do the same to UK citizens going abroad to work or visit

imagine needing a visa to go on holiday to spain of france
 
I love Britain, and, as such, will not be voting for UKIP. Although I respect Farage, he is still living in post-war Britain, has archaic ideas, and opposes many thing that I agree with, such as free movement between countries. I agree with his desire for free trade, but past that, there is very little that appeals to me. Furthermore, his core voters are 50+ white folk, who've probably never encountered anyone outside Christchurch in their long years.

The irrational fear of change is what annoys me most, though.
 
presumably if we started to restrict free movement of people into the uk and restrict work..other countries would be free to do the same to UK citizens going abroad to work or visit

imagine needing a visa to go on holiday to spain of france

Well that wouldn't happen seeing as their economies heavily rely on the tourist industry. It's this kind of drivel that's spouted out by EU lobbyists.

I won't be voting for UKIP but I agree on quite a few of thier policies. **awaits to be shouted down by some god almighty forum poster who wants to impose their political views on me**
 
I vote for who I think will get the best deal for people like me.

if you're earning the money I know some of you are then of course you are happy with the current government and don't want UKIP but let's not pretend its a moral decision
Which is pretty much the problem with our entire political system.

Unenlightened self-interest from both sides of the fence.

On a side note it's a straw man to assume that people dislike UKIP for those justifications, many left/right wing voters dislike them for entirely moral reasons.

Fear of change!, ever thought that people just don't like it and are happy as they are? so why should they change.
If change should occur or not should be based on the net social benefit, not simply to appease the current beneficiaries of society who are happy to maintain the existing social standards.
 
Last edited:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-26949172

"Claimants with poor spoken English will need to take part in local training, and be expected to improve within six months"

And what if they don't improve? And who pays for this?

Having lived in the countryside my entire life, i moved to inner city London for a nice job. Met my German gf (now looking for a house around Zone 6 onward), work in Moorgate with three thousand skilled professional workers of which most come from around the world, & have met only five fellow northerners.

But the sheer amount of poor immigrants south of the river is shocking. I feel like a stranger when catching the bus home & frankly sick of it. I felt more at home when on holiday in Iceland than London.

It's hard to describe in words but it just wears you down living around people you have nothing in common with, which is why we're moving out of London. So i will vote UKIP & hope this protest vote hits home with LibLabCon.
 
I love Britain, and, as such, will not be voting for UKIP. Although I respect Farage, he is still living in post-war Britain, has archaic ideas, and opposes many thing that I agree with, such as free movement between countries. I agree with his desire for free trade, but past that, there is very little that appeals to me. Furthermore, his core voters are 50+ white folk, who've probably never encountered anyone outside Christchurch in their long years.

The irrational fear of change is what annoys me most, though.

When your country is relatively wealthy but with generous benefits and free NHS how can freedom of movement be a good thing for us. You are suggesting an ideal that will decrease the wealth of the country.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-26949172

"Claimants with poor spoken English will need to take part in local training, and be expected to improve within six months"

And what if they don't improve? And who pays for this?

Having lived in the countryside my entire life, i moved to inner city London for a nice job. Met my German gf (now looking for a house around Zone 6 onward), work in Moorgate with three thousand skilled professional workers of which most come from around the world, & have met only five fellow northerners.

But the sheer amount of poor immigrants south of the river is shocking. I feel like a stranger when catching the bus home & frankly sick of it. I felt more at home when on holiday in Iceland than London.

It's hard to describe in words but it just wears you down living around people you have nothing in common with, which is why we're moving out of London. So i will vote UKIP & hope this protest vote hits home with LibLabCon.


From your link
"Jobseekers will need to live in the UK for three months to claim child benefit and child tax credit, starting in July"

WTF is going on? Our NHS needs money more then these people. And I hope they pay for the training and NOT ME.
 
they are people that want to kill you, and your children if they can.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHH

THINK OF THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN

v0n said:
Quote of Nigel himself, in the last (BBC) debate - "EU immigration has left the white working class, effectively, as an underclass". Call it slip of the tongue, call it true colours showing through, but I'm sorry fella, your party mates might be a little more closeted than most right wing parties, but they are what they are...

I picked up on that. I don't necessarily think it's racist just a poor choice of words. In my optimism, I hope he meant the "statistically average" working class. Foolish choice of words though as the liberally minded would have been sat there watching the debate waiting for a slip.
 
When your country is relatively wealthy but with generous benefits and free NHS how can freedom of movement be a good thing for us. You are suggesting an ideal that will decrease the wealth of the country.

The poor country boosts the youth population and provides cheaper labour, which decreases the costs of goods, which get sold to everyone (including the cheap labourers), which is where the money for the generous benefits and free NHS come from.

Restricting free movement would result in only one thing: less EU citizens from less developed EU countries, more immigrants from underdeveloped parts of Asia/Africa.

Being against free movement in the EU means you are for increasing immigration yet UKIP is firmly positioned against the latter as well. Just one example of the irrational stances of this joke of a party.
 
Politics in the UK is essentially voting who will beat the living **** out of you over the next 5 years.

Conservatives - The posh toff letting all his mates have a go at beating you

Lib Dem - The conservatives lapdog letting all the other parties have a go

Labour - The bloke who used to be beer swilling, mining, boxing working working class hero but is now a toff masquerading as a working class man stabbing you in the back every time you turn around

UKIP - The closet racist

BNP - The neo nazi
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHH

THINK OF THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN



I picked up on that. I don't necessarily think it's racist just a poor choice of words. In my optimism, I hope he meant the "statistically average" working class. Foolish choice of words though as the liberally minded would have been sat there watching the debate waiting for a slip.
Fortunately like all right wing politicians who hide their true opinions to appeal to the masses eventually they slip up and the mask falls long enough to reveal the real motives that lies beneath. Nigel has done well to maintain the illusion this long he must have better coaches than nick griffin ;)
 
I picked up on that. I don't necessarily think it's racist just a poor choice of words. In my optimism, I hope he meant the "statistically average" working class. Foolish choice of words though as the liberally minded would have been sat there watching the debate waiting for a slip.

He couldn't have said "statistically average working class" because there are no statistics to support such a wide statement.

There is a white underclass in the UK, but it certainly isn't the case that "the white working class has become an underclass" (i.e. Farage's statement is an absolute; the whole of the white working class (as a group) is now an underclass)

The problem of that white underclass is a complete lack of skills, confidence, and ambition. The solution to that is investment in education and opportunity targeting those groups. The solution isn't to be reducing the immigrant workforce, which only reduces the UK's productivity.
 
The pmanufacture oroosts the youth population and provides cheaper labour, which decreases the costs of goods, which get sold to everyone (including the cheap labourers), which is where the money for the generous benefits and free NHS come from.

Restricting free movement would result in only one thing: less EU citizens from less developed EU countries, more immigrants from underdeveloped parts of Asia/Africa.

Being against free movement in the EU means you are for increasing immigration yet UKIP is firmly positioned against the latter as well. Just one example of the irrational stances of this joke of a party.

Not true. remember we dont manufacturer much here anyway esoecially consumer items and what use are cheaper goods if no one can afford them due to being unemployed anyway?

Restricting free movement would stop the huge influx of non English speaking people. We don't need more non eu either. Q country with 2 million unemployed does not need to import a work force im sorry to break that to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom