Lulzsec!

Sounds like some of you guys are pretty poorly informed.

Lulzsec didn't hack anything to do with the UK census - It was confirmed a fake from the Lulzsec twitter account. And it looks like the guy that the papers say is the "Lulzsec leader" isn't anything to do with Lulzsec.

Oh hes involved with Lulzsec, clearly not one of the "master minds" but he definitely is involved with whats going on and knows somewhat about whats going on, potentially a fair bit. I'd say hes a relatively small player tho whos more involved with running ancillary facilities such as the IRCd and potentially involved with the DDoSing tho probably not the actual cracking aspects.
 
If anything all this has done is made me re-watch a few old classic films like War Games, Sneakers (still got a very dusty copy on vhs), Hackers (god awful I know), Antitrust & Die Hard 4.
 
Funny how they really know nothing about him, but make him out to be a crazy mastermind.

If anything all this has done is made me re-watch a few old classic films like War Games, Sneakers (still got a very dusty copy on vhs), Hackers (god awful I know), Antitrust & Die Hard 4.

And Swordfish?
 
Swordfish is an awesome movie :D (aside from the cringe worthy hacking) we need more travolta + oakenfold combinations.
 
Data protection acts don't prevent the wholesale release of data anyhow - they only require that certain levels of justification are met and systems in placed for secure handling of the data and so on.

Indeed. In my reply to you I said that I don't think that someone's idle comments on irc or a forum would be enough justification.
 
Sony Picture France was hacked the other day and over 170,000 emails and passwords were attained, wasn't by LulzSec though. The lad who did it said the day before that their site was vulnerable as well.
 
Indeed. In my reply to you I said that I don't think that someone's idle comments on irc or a forum would be enough justification.

Given what they've done over the last few days, I'm willing to bet that idle comments on their twitter feed would stand a good chance of being enough justification for releasing data to the security services.

For any large company to be open to SQL injection is truly pitiful, you'd fail year 1 Computing Science at uni if you did that.

I didn't look at it in detail but initial impression was the apache exploit they were using either injected code directly (buffer overflow) or allowed them to inject PHP code. Then giving them access to execute directly to the apache user and in some cases upload programs to brute force the superuser account.
 
Given what they've done over the last few days, I'm willing to bet that idle comments on their twitter feed would stand a good chance of being enough justification for releasing data to the security services.

I don't agree....but it's all just conjecture on our parts so I'm sure we'll find out one way or another if/when further arrests are made and details emerge about the case(s).
 
Was it any good? It should be up on the iplayer soon so I may see if I can catch it tomorrow...

It was pretty much just an overview of what they have done so far. I have not been keeping up with it tbh, so i didn't really know much about it.

I didn't know that they had made public private details of serving police officers for example, and apparantly have released some sensitive info that could put undercover officers in danger.

Basically they were questioning the morality and saying how they started out just doing it for laughs but now reckon they have a 'cause'

They spoke to one of the members through email.


I didn't get to watch all of it as i was at work and actually had to do some work whilst it was on.:rolleyes:
 
For any large company to be open to SQL injection is truly pitiful, you'd fail year 1 Computing Science at uni if you did that.

microsoft IIS server had an exploit some years ago i think it was iis 3.0 , its not always the companies fault unless they just dont keep their software updated
 
Back
Top Bottom