Luton airport...

Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Posts
21,978
If owner didn't respond to evoque recall where does the liability lie.

They should do a post-portem on all Luton cars to decide if any ev's contributed to transmission, from patient zero - apparently they failed to do that for Norway multi-storey fire, to see if batteries had remained inert.
 
Permabanned
Joined
28 Nov 2003
Posts
10,695
Location
Shropshire
The customers of mine who, shall we say, were bold enough to buy a JLR product probably go to bed dreaming of a terminal conflagration occurring, (after checking the small print of their insurance policies to ensure their policy provider hasn't foreseen "inexplicable" fires being an unaffordable risk due to common overwhelming JLR customer dissatisfaction). ;)

Or as Manny said to Sol, with a twinkle in his eyes, "Sorry to here about the fire Sol", with Sol replying, "Shut up you old fool, it's not `til next week".
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,309
Again the battery hasn't been the cause of the fire. A design fault has lead to the chemical becoming combustible.

A fuel source cannot catch fire on its own. It needs other factors to happen to achieve a fire.
I hate to break it to you, a battery is not a fuel source, it is the energy store. The fuel is electricity.

A fault can develop within a cell and can thermal run aways. A faulty battery is still.... a battery.... ergo batteries can cause fires.

I'm not even sure how this is even a discussion
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jan 2004
Posts
32,058
Location
Rutland
The diesel hasn't caused the engine to runaway has it. The runaway has been caused by a leaky turbo or something along those lines.

That's not what you said, you said this:

"A diesel car can never be the cause of a fire."

They definitely can and you don't see petrol engines running away and catching fire. They're vulnerable to run away because of the amount of compression they generate allows the engine to burn its own oil. It's not the car's fuel burning (initially anyway) but diesel car's definitely do catch fire and by design they're vulnerable to runaway.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
10,840
Location
London/S Korea
If owner didn't respond to evoque recall where does the liability lie.

They should do a post-portem on all Luton cars to decide if any ev's contributed to transmission, from patient zero - apparently they failed to do that for Norway multi-storey fire, to see if batteries had remained inert.
They did do that for the Norway one and no they did not contribute to the fire beyond any conventional vehicle. The (diesel) Opel Zafira that started the fire then spread to other vehicles. https://www.ri.se/sites/default/files/2020-12/FRIC D1.2-2020_01 FIVE conference presentation Multi-storey car park fire, presentation.pdf
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
18 Apr 2020
Posts
784
Imagine the phone call to the insurance company if your vehicle started that. Is it likely that the owners insurance will have to cough up for every car and the rebuild costs of the car park as well as flight disruption (can't see easyJet wanting to be out of pocket) and the emergency services amongst I am sure many more claimants.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
26,999
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
That's not what you said, you said this:

"A diesel car can never be the cause of a fire."

They definitely can and you don't see petrol engines running away and catching fire. They're vulnerable to run away because of the amount of compression they generate allows the engine to burn its own oil. It's not the car's fuel burning (initially anyway) but diesel car's definitely do catch fire and by design they're vulnerable to runaway.

Yes I did say that because a diesel car in isolation will not be the cause of the fire. It can be a million other things but its source of fuel is irrelevant. Runaway in a diesel car is not caused because it is powered by diesel fuel. It is because the engine runs by using compression as a source of heat and ignition for the fuel that also happens to work with engine oil due to a leak which means it drinks its own sump.

A car in itself is not the route cause of a problem. In your example it is the engine eating its own engine oil. The route cause is because a turbo oil seal has failed. Not because it is a diesel vehicle.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
13 Feb 2004
Posts
5,240
Location
Sealed in my Sarcophagus.
Imagine the phone call to the insurance company if your vehicle started that. Is it likely that the owners insurance will have to cough up for every car and the rebuild costs of the car park as well as flight disruption (can't see easyJet wanting to be out of pocket) and the emergency services amongst I am sure many more claimants.
next year comes along..... "your premium for this year is £1,500,000,000 would you like to renew now?" :p
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jan 2004
Posts
32,058
Location
Rutland
Yes I did say that because a diesel car in isolation will not be the cause of the fire. It can be a million other things but its source of fuel is irrelevant. Runaway in a diesel car is not caused because it is powered by diesel fuel. It is because the engine runs by using compression as a source of heat and ignition for the fuel that also happens to work with engine oil due to a leak which means it drinks its own sump.

A car in itself is not the route cause of a problem. In your example it is the engine eating its own engine oil. The route cause is because a turbo oil seal has failed. Not because it is a diesel vehicle.

You argue a diesel engine is vulnerable to runaway by design but if it runs away and catches fire it's not because its a diesel vehicle thats vulnerable to runaway by design?

Come on.....this is getting silly.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Dec 2011
Posts
5,460
Location
Belfast
Yes I did say that because a diesel car in isolation will not be the cause of the fire. It can be a million other things but its source of fuel is irrelevant. Runaway in a diesel car is not caused because it is powered by diesel fuel. It is because the engine runs by using compression as a source of heat and ignition for the fuel that also happens to work with engine oil due to a leak which means it drinks its own sump.

Lol, this is satire right? Right? I mean did you just claim a diesel car cannot cause a fire… only to then describe how a diesel car can cause a fire?

Pure comedy gold… oh no I mean logical lunacy :cry:
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
26,999
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
Lol, this is satire right? Right? I mean did you just claim a diesel car cannot cause a fire… only to then describe how a diesel car can cause a fire?

Pure comedy gold… oh no I mean logical lunacy :cry:

No it's called root cause analysis.

You are investigating what caused the fire and you turn around and say what caused the fire?

"It was because it was a diesel m8"

They will turn around and say why?

You will then say because diesel engines can runaway leading to explosion.

They will turn around and say why?

Because if a diesel leaks it can cause the engine to run off its own lubricating oil located in its sump?

They will turn around and say why?

Because a turbo oil seal failed.

The fire hasn't been caused simply because it is a diesel vehicle. The fire has been caused because a turbo oil seal has failed.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Dec 2011
Posts
5,460
Location
Belfast
You argue a diesel engine is vulnerable to runaway by design but if it runs away and catches fire it's not because its a diesel vehicle thats vulnerable to runaway by design?

Come on.....this is getting silly.

Exactly the logic seems to be… checks notes.

Diesel has a higher flashpoint. As such requires an engine design that uses compression as a source of heat to ignite the diesel. But it’s not the diesels fault if that type of engine causes it to… checks notes again… go on fire?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Posts
21,978
They did do that for the Norway one and no they did not contribute to the fire beyond any conventional vehicle. The (diesel) Opel Zafira that started the fire then spread to other vehicles. https://www.ri.se/sites/default/files/2020-12/FRIC D1.2-2020_01 FIVE conference presentation Multi-storey car park fire, presentation.pdf
listen to the full report where I linked the section in earlier post V
as I said interesting to know if the battery contributed - need to build up scientific data to supplement safety tests that are performed on batteries, to see what there relative safety is,
& good publicity if they remained inert .... if the fires are all out now then probably a good indication they did,
whether fire-brigade does do any gas sampling would be interesting to know, even if they have stand alone respirators.

don't know if there is any robust black box aspect on ev's, with latest eu regs all cars have to preserve more details of crash data(brakes/steering/trajectory before air bags), and you could store battery data in the same place.

That 2018 merseyside multi-storey fire rpt : https://www.bafsa.org.uk/wp-content...er/2018/12/Merseyside-FRS-Car-Park-Report.pdf
hmmh - Running fuel fires, due to failure of plastic fuel tanks, in early stages of vehicle firescan be expected. It is estimated 85% of European vehicles have plastic fuel tanks
similar norway fire - the many ev's weren't observational, by firemen, blamed more than ice, albeit no post mortem on batteries.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
26,999
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
Exactly the logic seems to be… checks notes.

Diesel has a higher flashpoint. As such requires an engine design that uses compression as a source of heat to ignite the diesel. But it’s not the diesels fault if that type of engine causes it to… checks notes again… go on fire?

Obviously because it is the fault of a component that is there to prevent engine oil mixing with the combustion cycle. If that component didn't fail it wouldn't be a issue which is the root cause for the engine blowing up.

A diesel car cannot be the cause of a fire because when everything is working as it should it is a normal consumer product but if a part of it fails and there are no fail safes in place to prevent a fire then that part that has failed is the root cause not because what fuel it uses. The reasoning why a Diesel engine can runaway and drink its own oil is not a cause is it?
 
Last edited:
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,441
Location
Wilds of suffolk
No it's called root cause analysis.

You are investigating what caused the fire and you turn around and say what caused the fire?

"It was because it was a diesel m8"

They will turn around and say why?

You will then say because diesel engines can runaway leading to explosion.

They will turn around and say why?

Because if a diesel leaks it can cause the engine to run off its own lubricating oil located in its sump?

They will turn around and say why?

Because a turbo oil seal failed.

The fire hasn't been caused simply because it is a diesel vehicle. The fire has been caused because a turbo oil seal has failed.

Would a petrol car suffer the same consequence of a failed turbo oil seal?
 
Associate
Joined
26 Oct 2007
Posts
1,290
Let's blame everything else except the fact its a diesel vehicle.
Of course it's got electrical components, every vehicle does, but don't let that get in the way of facts.

If it had been an ev, the same diesel combustion experts, would have been calling for blood.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
26,999
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
Would a petrol car suffer the same consequence of a failed turbo oil seal?

No it wouldn't because it runs on a spark to initiate combustion (well technically it could as a failed turbo oil seal could lead to other catastrophic scenarios where the engine could catch fire but we are getting silly now). but I would also say a Petrol car cannot be the cause of a fire. Likewise I would also say a battery powered car is not the cause of a fire.

Now if you said which vehicles were at higher risk of catching fire then that is completely different and would agree that EV's are safer in that regard but at the same time if you said which fire would be easier to put out then it would be a bit different.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Dec 2011
Posts
5,460
Location
Belfast
Let's blame everything else except the fact its a diesel vehicle.
Of course it's got electrical components, every vehicle does, but don't let that get in the way of facts.

If it had been an ev, the same diesel combustion experts, would have been calling for blood.

The recent Vauxhall Vivaro EV that went on fire was due to an electrical fault with the wiring behind the dashboard. Let’s focus on the fact it was an EV.

Diesel SUV goes on fire, it was electrical and do you know what else is electrical, those EV things.

Am I doing it right?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom