First off I will say that I have never owned a Macintosh, though I have occasionally 'used' one. I'm yet another uni student who likes the idea of a laptop, and am trying to determine if a mac is more suitable than the alternatives. Say, a vaio, as this seems a reasonable windows alternative.
On that note, in the interests of keeping this about hardware, please leave the os x vs vista fight out of it. From my perspective I'm forced to pay for at least one of them and I'll run debian anyway.
So, the hardware seems similar. The same intel processors, same speed ram, same hard drives. Does anyone know how the motherboards or power supply systems compare?
The casing is different on each, but it is hard to tell without stripping a mac apart whether the build quality and cooling systems are different. Since such effort goes into the aesthetics, is it fair to say that the internals are pretty much the same?
I know little about screens but would be interested if mac do anything nonstandard here. Battery life seems very good with the mac, I'm sure I'd adapt to the keyboard.
Warranty looks similar. Same attitude of 'void if you do anything to the hardware' that other people follow.
However this is as far as I've got. I can't work out what the fascination is, and here seems a good place to ask. Enthusiasts using Macintosh suggests there's good reason why, and I'd like to know what it is.
In a few days I will visit a 'genius' in one of their stores to ask their opinion and to judge for myself just how arrogant the title is. I will be annoyed if it becomes evident that they know less than me, but pleased if their technical support is competent.
So, what can the fans of Macintosh laptops tell me?
Cheers
On that note, in the interests of keeping this about hardware, please leave the os x vs vista fight out of it. From my perspective I'm forced to pay for at least one of them and I'll run debian anyway.
So, the hardware seems similar. The same intel processors, same speed ram, same hard drives. Does anyone know how the motherboards or power supply systems compare?
The casing is different on each, but it is hard to tell without stripping a mac apart whether the build quality and cooling systems are different. Since such effort goes into the aesthetics, is it fair to say that the internals are pretty much the same?
I know little about screens but would be interested if mac do anything nonstandard here. Battery life seems very good with the mac, I'm sure I'd adapt to the keyboard.
Warranty looks similar. Same attitude of 'void if you do anything to the hardware' that other people follow.
However this is as far as I've got. I can't work out what the fascination is, and here seems a good place to ask. Enthusiasts using Macintosh suggests there's good reason why, and I'd like to know what it is.
In a few days I will visit a 'genius' in one of their stores to ask their opinion and to judge for myself just how arrogant the title is. I will be annoyed if it becomes evident that they know less than me, but pleased if their technical support is competent.
So, what can the fans of Macintosh laptops tell me?
Cheers