The OP was vague I agree. I am curious as to why mac has attracted such a strong following when the hardware looks to be rather similar to windows, and thought it would be something beyond the software. Beyond that I fear some of you may have taken my post the wrong way, starting roughly from k1llswitch.
Thanks for the sentiment, but I was hoping to keep OS out of this.
I didn't realise one booked time for this. I know bugger all about windows, osx or linux. I'm far more interested in the electronics than in the software. The idea behind speaking to one of their technicians was to learn what makes a mac different from a pc in terms of hardware. As an example, the dc socket on the backs of laptops becomes loose and/or breaks off frequently, does this happen with macbooks? Is the cooling system different, are the screen/inverter assemblies different? I repair laptops part time, so have a pretty good idea what goes wrong there. However I rarely see macs (aside from ancient G4s which seem to be dropping like flies), so I know little about them.
Too true, I apologise for this. The question was vague. I can rephrase as "how does the hardware of a Macintosh laptop vary from its competitors?" but thought this would be too specific a question.
Leonardo da Vinci was a genius. Nikola Tesla was another. However spectacularly trained these guys are, they are surely misnamed. I am not accusing the team of it, I am accusing whoever thought this a fitting description.
I do not have any interest in picking a fight with these guys. The point was that if the hardware is fundementally the same, despite my hoping for a significant improvement over the alternative, I would be disappointed and persist in trying to find out how the hardware differed. This would clearly end with both myself and the unfortunate I was speaking to frustrated, and generally be a waste of time for us both.
Similarly to the above, but cheers for joining in the abuse. OSX is a customised version of unix designed to be of the most use to the most people. I'd rather start from a less customised version in order to gradually learn how to set it up as I wish, that is my choice. Again, I am not interested in osx vs windows vs linux, there's quite enough written on that topic already.
edit: special credit to everyone who read
It's how the OS uses the resources, not how fast the hardware is that counts.
Thanks for the sentiment, but I was hoping to keep OS out of this.
He'll know more than you about fixing Macs, and that's his job.
He may well know much less about Windows than you, but I'm sure you can forgive him that.
I didn't realise one booked time for this. I know bugger all about windows, osx or linux. I'm far more interested in the electronics than in the software. The idea behind speaking to one of their technicians was to learn what makes a mac different from a pc in terms of hardware. As an example, the dc socket on the backs of laptops becomes loose and/or breaks off frequently, does this happen with macbooks? Is the cooling system different, are the screen/inverter assemblies different? I repair laptops part time, so have a pretty good idea what goes wrong there. However I rarely see macs (aside from ancient G4s which seem to be dropping like flies), so I know little about them.
Very hard to work out what you're asking here.
Too true, I apologise for this. The question was vague. I can rephrase as "how does the hardware of a Macintosh laptop vary from its competitors?" but thought this would be too specific a question.
Sorry, had to add this... you're accusing the genius team of arrogance while you talk like that?
Leonardo da Vinci was a genius. Nikola Tesla was another. However spectacularly trained these guys are, they are surely misnamed. I am not accusing the team of it, I am accusing whoever thought this a fitting description.
I do not have any interest in picking a fight with these guys. The point was that if the hardware is fundementally the same, despite my hoping for a significant improvement over the alternative, I would be disappointed and persist in trying to find out how the hardware differed. This would clearly end with both myself and the unfortunate I was speaking to frustrated, and generally be a waste of time for us both.
Oh I missed the bit about booking time with a store worker so you can make yourself feel smug. Enjoy your Linux I guess, keep that stereotype alive!
Similarly to the above, but cheers for joining in the abuse. OSX is a customised version of unix designed to be of the most use to the most people. I'd rather start from a less customised version in order to gradually learn how to set it up as I wish, that is my choice. Again, I am not interested in osx vs windows vs linux, there's quite enough written on that topic already.
edit: special credit to everyone who read
and didn't bother to finish the sentence. I will be pleased if they know the inside of a mac inside and out, but this falls rather short of genius. If instead they are capable of diagnosis but send hardware elsewhere for repair, I would be disappointed.just how arrogant the title is
Last edited: