MAJOR Superpi - Survey

welshtom · 1 Aug 2005 at 20:48

you lol, just wondered because you are 1:1 whereas i'm always on a divider, wanted to see if you see any gains in 3d mark 01 with the 1:1 setting

Jokester · 1 Aug 2005 at 21:19

Memory 1:1, 2-2-2-5.

Jokester

NickK · 1 Aug 2005 at 21:26

Hmm a single core run (other core sat twiddling it's thumbs) with SuperPI/mod1.4:

Also just run two superpi/mod1.4s - as per normal with multi cpu there's a slow down - about 7% seems usual for the X2.

vocch · 1 Aug 2005 at 21:38

Hi welshtom...when i got my spi score i tried so hard to beat 30s didn't think of running 3d01...so i just ran it at my 24/7 9x300 1:1 timings 2.5-4-4-8,
Card is a gigabyte x800 pro at 500/500 score just under 25k.

welshtom · 1 Aug 2005 at 21:55

ok thats cool, your prob better off on a divider with lower timings on the ram than running it so high with slack timings

vocch · 1 Aug 2005 at 22:03

Will try again using divider...one good thing will be able to lower volts on chip+mem as when running ram 1:1 seems to need more volts.

Its_Me · 1 Aug 2005 at 22:15

Ok Hows about a 25secs on the button @ 3GHz

Not 1 tweak applied.

With win2003server and tweaks I should be able to shave another sec off this

JudgeC · 1 Aug 2005 at 23:41

Just under 31 secs with my Pentium-M with stock cooling on CT-479.

Edit - No Tweaks (Whatever they are).

welshtom · 2 Aug 2005 at 08:05

Tweaks?

Martynt74 · 2 Aug 2005 at 09:04

Just software tweaks to get faster scores.

Such as for 3dmark you have LOD tweaks to get higher scores on nvidia cards etc.

No tweaks means just loading windows and running without fiddling

welshtom · 2 Aug 2005 at 09:06

ok, i normally shut down a few things before i run it! msn etc..

weescott · 2 Aug 2005 at 09:36

Pi table updated.

Martynt74 · 2 Aug 2005 at 09:40

Boo i liked it before when i was top

NickK · 2 Aug 2005 at 09:42

weescott said:
Pi table updated.

Ahh forgot to say the timings:

Ram at 216MHz (9/10 div) and CAS 2.0, 3-2-2 2T.

Cooling XP-90C + YS-Tech 92mm.

vocch · 2 Aug 2005 at 14:30

welshtom said:
ok thats cool, your prob better off on a divider with lower timings on the ram than running it so high with slack timings

You were right...using 166 divider...2.5-3-3-7 timings and overclock on the card's mem gets me a nice 28k...and there was me thinking 1:1 mem would be the best... well happy with score thanks.

aftershxck · 2 Aug 2005 at 14:47

NickK please don't say both cores are prime stable for 8 hours plus at that voltage? I couldn't get stable with 1.52v in cpu-z (about 1.56 real - 1.425*110%).

Although I could pass the OCCT 30 min stress test

NickK · 2 Aug 2005 at 14:58

aftershxck said:
NickK please don't say both cores are prime stable for 8 hours plus at that voltage? I couldn't get stable with 1.52v in cpu-z (about 1.56 real - 1.425*110%).

Although I could pass the OCCT 30 min stress test

Stable for at least 48 hours as far as I know..

monkeypants · 2 Aug 2005 at 16:12

All feel sorry for me, I can't get this chip stable higher than 2005Mhz.. Maybe next year it'll go to 2006Mhz?

Athlon XP-M2400+
2.5-3-3-8 @ 200Mhz * 10

welshtom · 2 Aug 2005 at 16:36

vocch said:
You were right...using 166 divider...2.5-3-3-7 timings and overclock on the card's mem gets me a nice 28k...and there was me thinking 1:1 mem would be the best... well happy with score thanks.

no probs

weescott · 2 Aug 2005 at 17:00

monkeypants said:
All feel sorry for me, I can't get this chip stable higher than 2005Mhz.. Maybe next year it'll go to 2006Mhz?

It's probably due to the Corsair VS ram. That stuff really sucks at overclocking!

Get some ye-olde BH5 and watch the seconds dissapear. Or even try a higher multi!