Man arrested for riding his bike

Ahh a peddle-o-phile..

7530008893555copy.jpg
 
I thought riding without adequate protection left you numb for a few days.

I still can't believe this... what the ! does he do? Ring it's bell? Fondle it's big end? Squeeze it's big disks hard until it squeals?
 
Last edited:
I still can't believe this... what the ! does he do? Ring it's bell? Fondle it's big end? Squeeze it's big disks hard until it squeals?

You're missing the point aren't you? He is on the sex offender's register.

Ways to get on sex offender's register:

1. Rape

2. Paedophilia

3. shaft bike (in own bedroom)? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Just read it again:

At the beginning of the artical
"Robert Stewart, 51, admitted..."

at the end:
"Stewart had denied the offence, claiming it was caused by a misunderstanding after he had too much to drink."

So did he plead guilty or not?
 
Dirty mongoose deserves all he gets, playing with someone's bottom bracket is not to be taken lightly. No excuse at all for getting the horn and mountain bikes.

There's a large group of these gear shifting cranks that are part of a chain.

I, for one, am glad I didn't see his chopper.
 
Just read it again:

At the beginning of the artical
"Robert Stewart, 51, admitted..."

at the end:
"Stewart had denied the offence, claiming it was caused by a misunderstanding after he had too much to drink."

So did he plead guilty or not?

"had denied..."

Obviously changed his plea...
 
Mannequin Sex Not Indecent Exposure: Supreme Court

South Dakota: Sioux Falls resident Michael James Plenty Horse had his misdemeanor conviction unanimously reversed by the state's Supreme Court on Thursday after deciding his simulating sex with a mannequin did not stand up to indecent exposure laws.

They said the statute "criminalizes sexual gratification by displaying or showing one's genitals in public." Evidence in the case could not prove that this was his intention when he was found on top of a mannequin with his pants half-down in 2005.

Plenty Horse was found by a guard in the school storage room. "Lewd though it may be, [it] does not fall within the purview of the indecent exposure statute," said the court. He would've had to have registered as a sex offender had the charges stood.
 
Back
Top Bottom