Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Pogba, Sturridge are two that immediately spring to mind as making your claim baseless and silly, a word you keep using to describe what I'm doing.
A club has exactly NO say in if Hazard signs a new contract.
If he's brilliant for 2 more years he has two likely options fighting for a starting place at Chelsea, signing for a HUGE wage with zero transfer cost to pretty much any club he chooses. If his contract runs down he will be offered another one, it's likely much much more profitable to the player to see out the contract and sign a no transfer fee huge wage contract.
Now if he was first team at Chelsea there would be far less chance of this happening, but younger kids who spend their whole time out on loan, who struggle to get first team games at big spending clubs are just as likely to be swayed by a huge contract after waiting for a year or two rather than a okay contract sooner.
Chelsea get no say in this, and Hazard hasn't exactly ruled out the possibility of a big money move to PSG, or potentially a couple other clubs, in the future.
Once again I'm raising it as a possibility because you said quite simply the minimum they would get is 10mil therefore it's a great deal. You're absolutely discounting the possibility which is absolutely silly as there are countless examples over the years. Pogba being a very recent situation that resembles Hazards exactly, rather than sign a contract he saw out another year and left for a far far higher offer as Juve didn't have to pay a significant transfer fee.
It happens all the time and you've made three posts basically congratulating Chelsea on a brilliant deal already done by all accounts with no other possibility. Yes ignoring a strong possibility is very silly and you repeatedly do it.
As for the financial records, again you ignore it but Chelsea's financial records that claim 1.4mil profit ALSO say their debt increased 70mil that year....... nothing dodgy there.
When my bank account goes down £70... I list it as having £1 more in the account afterwards... yup.
A club has exactly NO say in if Hazard signs a new contract.
If he's brilliant for 2 more years he has two likely options fighting for a starting place at Chelsea, signing for a HUGE wage with zero transfer cost to pretty much any club he chooses. If his contract runs down he will be offered another one, it's likely much much more profitable to the player to see out the contract and sign a no transfer fee huge wage contract.
Now if he was first team at Chelsea there would be far less chance of this happening, but younger kids who spend their whole time out on loan, who struggle to get first team games at big spending clubs are just as likely to be swayed by a huge contract after waiting for a year or two rather than a okay contract sooner.
Chelsea get no say in this, and Hazard hasn't exactly ruled out the possibility of a big money move to PSG, or potentially a couple other clubs, in the future.
Once again I'm raising it as a possibility because you said quite simply the minimum they would get is 10mil therefore it's a great deal. You're absolutely discounting the possibility which is absolutely silly as there are countless examples over the years. Pogba being a very recent situation that resembles Hazards exactly, rather than sign a contract he saw out another year and left for a far far higher offer as Juve didn't have to pay a significant transfer fee.
It happens all the time and you've made three posts basically congratulating Chelsea on a brilliant deal already done by all accounts with no other possibility. Yes ignoring a strong possibility is very silly and you repeatedly do it.
As for the financial records, again you ignore it but Chelsea's financial records that claim 1.4mil profit ALSO say their debt increased 70mil that year....... nothing dodgy there.
When my bank account goes down £70... I list it as having £1 more in the account afterwards... yup.
