• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Mantle Feedback/Bugs

It makes you wonder why AMD chose an EA game to showcase Mantle, a company that releases game after game with major bugs on release. I know it was a big pull getting EA on board because of the amount of sales their games have but still...

Think its more to do with the games they have.. Massive naming like Battlefield more chance getting your tech out there.
If it was a small time company with not much a big gaming name then less talk around Mantle would have happened.

what I think away.
 
While what you say is valid as such - did they talk it up, or was it us?

Was it more a case of them over hyping it, or numerous people on forums like this still not seeming to understand what it is they are doing/trying to do and what BETA tests and early software are all about ?

And even if, in some people's opinions, they did over talk it. Where once have they said this is a done and dusted, fully completed, released, finished, no issues, not a BETA, product ? Have they released non BETA drivers? Have they removed the option from their website to report issues with the drivers and software?

And feels rushed to who exactly? You with an nVidia card in your sig, or me sat here, you know, actually using it on a 7970 and with no where near the size or number of issues that people seem to be blowing it up in to? If you have tried it and experienced these issues for yourself, first hand then I apologise.

tbh, just in a bad mood today and as much as I try and bite my lip on this place there is so much rubbish spouted on here at times it is hard to do so.

Look at the contents of the PR slides, watch some of the dev conference videos, look at the twitter comments especially those made in response to people who've tried to get information - tons of PR spin and hype. Also consumers talking it up on forums, etc. but thats really another matter.

The problem was somewhat that they talked themselves into a corner both in terms of release timing and what it could deliver and had to put something out.

I have a problem with AMD (and ATI before that but thats another story really), how many times they've talked things up - made big words then failed to deliver (and 6 months later whatever next big thing they talked up isn't even in people's memories any more) or delivered but something thats half arsed at best so until they actually deliver a polished version of Mantle and have a lot of people onboard not just a few devs that are all but in their pocket I'm gonna be scathing.

PS Don't judge people purely by what they have in their sig - I have a variety of hardware to play with thats not listed and also live with other people who have an interest in computing (mostly work in 2nd or 3rd line support) with their own brand loyalties or lack of.

It makes you wonder why AMD chose an EA game to showcase Mantle, a company that releases game after game with major bugs on release. I know it was a big pull getting EA on board because of the amount of sales their games have but still...

TBH the problems with BF4 aren't really that much EA's fault, possibly exacerbated by EA pushing a release to beat other games/seasonal sales but the engine itself has a lot of basic flaws even though it does quite a bit of the "grand" stuff well. Many of the issues (gameplay balance aside) aren't actually at the game design level but rather stemming from flaws in fairly basic engine mechanics and/or from the game design level having to try and paper over issues in the functions they are built on top of. A lot of these issues probably hadn't come to light before AMD got involved.
 
Last edited:
I've said previously I think Mantle will come good eventually but with a company like EA who just won't listen to you if you say you need more time it was a very dodgy decision. Yes, they chose Dice but as Humbug said they knew who Dice have to answer to so in effect they were chosing EA.
 
Look at the contents of the PR slides, watch some of the dev conference videos, look at the twitter comments especially those made in response to people who've tried to get information - tons of PR spin and hype. Also consumers talking it up on forums, etc. but thats really another matter.

The problem was somewhat that they talked themselves into a corner both in terms of release timing and what it could deliver and had to put something out.

I have a problem with AMD (and ATI before that but thats another story really), how many times they've talked things up - made big words then failed to deliver (and 6 months later whatever next big thing they talked up isn't even in people's memories any more) or delivered but something thats half arsed at best so until they actually deliver a polished version of Mantle and have a lot of people onboard not just a few devs that are all but in their pocket I'm gonna be scathing.

PS Don't judge people purely by what they have in their sig - I have a variety of hardware to play with thats not listed and also live with other people who have an interest in computing (mostly work in 2nd or 3rd line support) with their own brand loyalties or lack of.

i 'Half way' agree with Roff, AMD do have a habit failing to deliver, but on this occasion i feel Its EA rushing BF4 and not giving DICE the support they need for BF4. the Mantle API works very well indded with the Star Swarm app. i'm not saying there is nothing wrong with Mantle, but there can't be to much wrong with it if its its doing what AMD said it would in that Star Swarm app.

Where i completely agree with Roff is in people judging people by what they have in their signature, i have both Intel and AMD CPU rigs. i like them both. What i don't do any-more is proudly display what i have. far to offten its that which gets picked up on rather than what i say, i have even had people tell me i don't know what i'm talking about because i have an AMD CPU.
Its not on, we are all Hardware enthusiasts a like.
 
I've said previously I think Mantle will come good eventually but with a company like EA who just won't listen to you if you say you need more time it was a very dodgy decision. Yes, they chose Dice but as Humbug said they knew who Dice have to answer to so in effect they were chosing EA.

Honestly they need to get some code samples out there, get people building smaller stuff - tech demos, proof of concept, simpler games, etc. on Mantle in general if they want it to succeed, sticking with a few select studios and not even as much as putting out a very simple example of bringing up the device interface, enumerating resolutions, etc. isn't the right way to go about it. They need to get that groundswell going of programmers in general going "wow this actually makes it a waste of my time working with DX" which would put more pressure on the rest of the industry to adjust.


EDIT: In isolation I want Mantle to succeed as for a variety of reasons I think its something thats badly needed, I'd just rather AMD did less talking about it and wowed people with a solid product.
 
Last edited:
Look at the contents of the PR slides, watch some of the dev conference videos, look at the twitter comments especially those made in response to people who've tried to get information - tons of PR spin and hype. Also consumers talking it up on forums, etc. but thats really another matter.

The problem was somewhat that they talked themselves into a corner both in terms of release timing and what it could deliver and had to put something out.

I have a problem with AMD (and ATI before that but thats another story really), how many times they've talked things up - made big words then failed to deliver (and 6 months later whatever next big thing they talked up isn't even in people's memories any more) or delivered but something thats half arsed at best so until they actually deliver a polished version of Mantle and have a lot of people onboard not just a few devs that are all but in their pocket I'm gonna be scathing.

PS Don't judge people purely by what they have in their sig - I have a variety of hardware to play with thats not listed and also live with other people who have an interest in computing (mostly work in 2nd or 3rd line support) with their own brand loyalties or lack of.



TBH the problems with BF4 aren't really that much EA's fault, possibly exacerbated by EA pushing a release to beat other games/seasonal sales but the engine itself has a lot of basic flaws even though it does quite a bit of the "grand" stuff well. Many of the issues (gameplay balance aside) aren't actually at the game design level but rather stemming from flaws in fairly basic engine mechanics and/or from the game design level having to try and paper over issues in the functions they are built on top of. A lot of these issues probably hadn't come to light before AMD got involved.


I have looked at them, watched them etc and apart from a couple of dubious internal testing performance figures, which for all we know in their internal testing are in fact totally valid. I still fail to see where they have over hyped or as some people seem to thing, out right lied about any of this at any point.

Nice to see you finally admit you have an issue with AMD/ATi, though that is pretty obvious every time you spam threads like these with nothing useful.

My experience, again of trying this out, is that Mantle does what they said it would, improves CPU usage and bottlenecks over DX. Yes there are issues with it in BF4 but then we are talking about a Beta driver with an Alpha/Beta API retro fitted into a game that is know to have issues.

I never judged anyone by their sig but way to avoid my pre apology on the matter and straight answer as to whether you have any actual first hand experience of this, or are just band wagon jumping as you seem to do a lot of.

Conversely, don't judge those by what they don't mention. No one is impressed with your mention of 2nd, 3rd line support. ;)

But you win, I now bow out. Because you've done what you always have a tendency to do in these threads, which is ignore everything and twist it into something it wasn't.

My initial point was my frustration of people on here who are more than willing to install unfinished BETA software and expect it all to either be perfect out the box or spend more time posting/moaning about their issues than actually reporting them back to the developers so they can be fixed.

But you lot carry on with your crusade.
 
Recently got an MSI R9 290 Gaming so was keen to give the Mantle drivers a go. Had an issue with the card in that one fan was stuck so temperatures were getting to 90oC and assumed that was the reason for frequent crashes in BF4. Once the temperature problem was resolved I continued to get crashes with the game freezing and then reverting to a black screen - I had to use Task Manager to shut down the BF.exe to recover from this). Strangely though there could be long periods of stability for an entire evening and then the following morning crash after crash after crash; there is no sense to it.

I decided to go back to the last set of stable drivers (13.12) and stability has been excellent but I do notice a drop in FPS; which I will take for the time being until Mantle is sorted.

It looks like Mantle could be good but I think the Beta was released too early; cynically I think there was maybe a deadline and the focus was on hitting that rather than being brave enough to say its not ready yet.

Andy
 
Any further driver updates since the first mantle one or is it going to be another month?
 
Nice to see you finally admit you have an issue with AMD/ATi, though that is pretty obvious every time you spam threads like these with nothing useful.

I have never hid or denied it and stated a fair few times over the years as to which way my bias runs and for what reasons :S as for nothing useful I guess the content and point of much of what I'm posting goes right over your head.

Conversely, don't judge those by what they don't mention. No one is impressed with your mention of 2nd, 3rd line support. ;)

Wasn't meant to impress - it was purely illustration of what I was saying - that I have other sources of exposure to these things rather than just the hardware I'm sitting at right now. (I mean why would I try to impress with mention of other people working in 2nd or 3rd line support? maybe if I did myself but other people? maybe if they were bill gates or something...)

Honestly your ego is mis-reading or reading a lot in what I'm saying that isn't there at all, unfortunatly not entirely uncommon on these forums regarding my posts.
 
Last edited:
The main issue is, Nvidia have always been full of hype and often lies and they've frequently failed to deliver. Geforce FX, going to be 40% faster than the 9700pro.... late, insanely hot, insanely loud and you know, slower. 480gtx launched only 3 separate times, lies, woodscrews, etc. The ingame streaming was promised a year before it was delivered, or like 8 months, and promised of 2% performance hit when users frequently report way higher.

Nvidia fail to deliver on what they try to, so do AMD, Ati, Intel, and most companies. I have no problem with companies trying to achieve things, if they don't try to do new and better things, we'd all be stuck on a GF3.

As for all these things AMD failed to deliver, I see you consistently talk about them but never name them, funny that. You don't mention AMD putting in loads of effort to create GDDR3/4/5 because the industry didn't have good enough memory, they achieved that, it's the only current reasons you Nvidia GPU's can be as fast as they are.

As for the media hype, developer conferences are JUST THAT, developer conferences, their intended target is not end users AT ALL. The massive majority of all Mantle info was restricted to NDA showings that weren't video'd, conference videos of which some were leaked, and some were released at a later date because people were asking for information.

Backed themselves into a corner, rubbish, complete rubbish, media hype, complete rubbish. The "announcement" of Mantle amounted to a a what 2 hour conference or something in which in the final 5 mins they went "so that's the cards, oh, btw, we're releasing a new API, lols, laters".

Quite some time later again at a developer conference, where it is entirely usual to talk about these things Johan and Oxide talked about Mantle, Johan's main talk was broadcast, Oxide's was not, there were few numbers, little direct information but mostly just talking about how it would work and why it would help developers. This isn't media hype, and neither is people talking about it on the forums. People wanted more information and as such people requested more info and interviews from AMD.

I didn't see AMD claiming anything other than release end of year. As with all things internet now, people take a little information and make up whatever they want. The "release date" amounted to Dice saying they hoped to have it available late december. This was mostly pushed by the usual suspects as a "launch" when it was never billed by anyone to do with AMD as anything regarding a launch. They constant "they're late" was paraded around by people wanting to put a negative spin on everything AMD.

Simple fact is it's an API, this is a huge step and AMD have never held a press event purely for Mantle, nor proclaimed launch dates nor said much of anything to consumers about it. Dev's need to know about what is coming up in the world of developing software, Intel, Nvidia, AMD, ARm all release this kind of information all have these kinds of dev conferences, all telling people what's coming up, how it will benefit them and how to use it. 99% of this information has nothing to do with the end user. AMD have done little to nothing to target or make huge claims about Mantle to end users.


In regards to AMD making all these claims they don't deliver on being a reason to dislike them(yet never list any of them), yet not hating Nvidia for consistently doing the same. Lying flat out often, deceiving almost always with anything to do with Tegra for 5+ years, huge lateness to multiple products which frequently didn't deliver what was promised. I find the hypocrisy.... entertaining.
 
The main issue is, Nvidia have always been full of hype and often lies and they've frequently failed to deliver. Geforce FX, going to be 40% faster than the 9700pro.... late, insanely hot, insanely loud and you know, slower. 480gtx launched only 3 separate times, lies, woodscrews, etc. The ingame streaming was promised a year before it was delivered, or like 8 months, and promised of 2% performance hit when users frequently report way higher.

Nvidia fail to deliver on what they try to, so do AMD, Ati, Intel, and most companies. I have no problem with companies trying to achieve things, if they don't try to do new and better things, we'd all be stuck on a GF3.

As for all these things AMD failed to deliver, I see you consistently talk about them but never name them, funny that. You don't mention AMD putting in loads of effort to create GDDR3/4/5 because the industry didn't have good enough memory, they achieved that, it's the only current reasons you Nvidia GPU's can be as fast as they are.

As for the media hype, developer conferences are JUST THAT, developer conferences, their intended target is not end users AT ALL. The massive majority of all Mantle info was restricted to NDA showings that weren't video'd, conference videos of which some were leaked, and some were released at a later date because people were asking for information.

Backed themselves into a corner, rubbish, complete rubbish, media hype, complete rubbish. The "announcement" of Mantle amounted to a a what 2 hour conference or something in which in the final 5 mins they went "so that's the cards, oh, btw, we're releasing a new API, lols, laters".

Quite some time later again at a developer conference, where it is entirely usual to talk about these things Johan and Oxide talked about Mantle, Johan's main talk was broadcast, Oxide's was not, there were few numbers, little direct information but mostly just talking about how it would work and why it would help developers. This isn't media hype, and neither is people talking about it on the forums. People wanted more information and as such people requested more info and interviews from AMD.

I didn't see AMD claiming anything other than release end of year. As with all things internet now, people take a little information and make up whatever they want. The "release date" amounted to Dice saying they hoped to have it available late december. This was mostly pushed by the usual suspects as a "launch" when it was never billed by anyone to do with AMD as anything regarding a launch. They constant "they're late" was paraded around by people wanting to put a negative spin on everything AMD.

Simple fact is it's an API, this is a huge step and AMD have never held a press event purely for Mantle, nor proclaimed launch dates nor said much of anything to consumers about it. Dev's need to know about what is coming up in the world of developing software, Intel, Nvidia, AMD, ARm all release this kind of information all have these kinds of dev conferences, all telling people what's coming up, how it will benefit them and how to use it. 99% of this information has nothing to do with the end user. AMD have done little to nothing to target or make huge claims about Mantle to end users.


In regards to AMD making all these claims they don't deliver on being a reason to dislike them(yet never list any of them), yet not hating Nvidia for consistently doing the same. Lying flat out often, deceiving almost always with anything to do with Tegra for 5+ years, huge lateness to multiple products which frequently didn't deliver what was promised. I find the hypocrisy.... entertaining.

Not sure if that was somewhat aimed at me but I've never held nVidia up as a paragon of delivering - my words quite a few times has been along the lines of "lesser of 2 evils to live with" (in context of the gaming space). I don't tend to pickup on nVidia so much as in general they don't tend to talk things up to quite the same level or play as much politics when hyping something up.

It is quite hilarious but also tedious that certain people think I'm black and white anti-AMD, pro-nVidia when infact its not true at all - certain people only read as far into what I'm saying as the first anti-AMD comment and thats all they ever see :( even when I've gone back and quoted for them previous comments that are pro-AMD or anti-nVidia (one such even in this thread http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25781126&postcount=421 ) I still get the same crap completely ignoring or not even seeing half of what I post.

Regarding listing things - you don't really need to mention anything more than Bulldozer to prove the point :|
 
Not sure if that was somewhat aimed at me but I've never held nVidia up as a paragon of delivering - my words quite a few times has been along the lines of "lesser of 2 evils to live with" (in context of the gaming space). I don't tend to pickup on nVidia so much as in general they don't tend to talk things up to quite the same level or play as much politics when hyping something up.

It is quite hilarious but also tedious that certain people think I'm black and white anti-AMD, pro-nVidia when infact its not true at all - certain people only read as far into what I'm saying as the first anti-AMD comment and thats all they ever see :( even when I've gone back and quoted for them previous comments that are pro-AMD or anti-nVidia (one such even in this thread http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25781126&postcount=421 ) I still get the same crap completely ignoring or not even seeing half of what I post.

Regarding listing things - you don't really need to mention anything more than Bulldozer to prove the point :|

I am not sure DM's post was directed at you specifically. Well i certainly wouldn't include you in the list of the usual suspects that thread crap and bicker about every little thing. I think DM's post was aimed at those people. Your post was just the straw that broke camels back and made DM write his little speech.

And i just want to say that i don't normally agree or even like a lot of DM's posts as they have a tendency to come from really anti nvidia viewpoint. But i agree completely with nearly everything he wrote in that post.
 
Guys, fresh Video from Germany.
Under Windows 8.1, Mantle is destroyed... (Direct X 11.1 is the key)
Nvidia clearly wins here.

 
Last edited:
Wonderful demonstration of the Mantle effect. Make sure you watch in 1080P/1440P/2160P quality. :cool:



That's pretty cool, but the directx version is showing to have 1 less job thread. I don't know how much a difference it would make. Maybe they discuss it in the video, but my German is a bit rusty (as in I have never known any German).
 
Guys, fresh Video from Germany.
Under Windows 8.1, Mantle is destroyed... (Direct X 11.1 is the key)
Nvidia clearly wins here.


Duvar - I miss summat in that? Where's the Mantle comparison? Looked like DX11 vs 11.1 or W7 vs W8.1 Even then I still dont see where Nvidia clearly wins. Please explain.
 
Back
Top Bottom