Completely. Lol.
Marcus Rashford
- Thread starter C.R.A.Z.Y
- Start date
Completely. Lol.
I reckon amazons missing tax bill should cover it easily.
He could. But so could you. Nobody is stopping you from donating to charities that provide these services or even starting one yourself.
Then only increase the tax on the high earners, like Rashford. If you choose to earn more then you choose to pay more
I think you misquoted originally - Dis said nothing like that but Roar did.
Yeah my bad it’s an attitude that really needs to die.
In that case my apologies sir. I took it the wrong way
Np. Don't get me wrong, there are some people who take the mick, my cousin is an unfortunate example of it but right now I have a utility room with food parcels in that the gf was dropping off for her students that require them. Unfortunately some will have to wait until tomorrow as they weren't home!
These will be continuing throughout the summer holidays.
Oh don;t get me wrong. Roars attitude is bang out of order in my opinion - and this is coming from someone who lives with just his partner and has no plans to ever have kids. I'm happy to be taxed a couple of quid a month to help avoid poverty.
Ehhh
The J.K Rowling news was hardly a positive story unless you consider casual hate speech about trans people positive?
And I actually posted a positive story about gay & trans no longer being persecuted by employers in the US, again don't see how that is negative unless you are homophobic or trans-phobic !
That's because you posses empathy and compassion, many here are rather primitive and seem to have skipped that part in their evolution!
We're probably going to be spending the best part of half a trillion pounds on trying to prop up everything through this and there's people moaning about spending another £120 million on feeding the most vulnerable in society and how that might affect them
This thread really does sort the wheat from the chaff
This thread really does sort the wheat from the chaff
I wasn't asking the tax payer to fund the meals though, why would I do that? I feel people who want to donate should simply donate and not expect the tax payer to fund everything. Charity is great, it allows people who want to help out to do that without burdening everyone with the cost.
In my opinion, charity should not exist. The state, funded by taxes (which should be largely provided by higher earners) should be able to provide for everyone. Every charity required is a failure of the state to provide adequate care.
I imagine their foaming at the mouth waiting to "pop off".
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,683
Boris saying it's the right thing to do
If it was the right thing to do, why did it require a nationally public campaign to get you to do the right thing
If it was the right thing to do, why did it require a nationally public campaign to get you to do the right thing
No I red her comment and thought no one else is silly enough to have the same views and took your post the wrong way.
It really should be an embarrassment to be sat here with all our mod cons and BMW’s on the drive when we have people living in poverty around the world. We have enough to go around we just need to be less greedy and less selfish as a species.
Rashford is a positive role model for any young person growing up we need more of them and less of Katie Hopkins.
He has already donated loads of his free time (something which money can't buy btw) helping out lots of people less fortunate than himself!
But hey, you keep having a sly dig at him
As you work in a school, you must have also seen those parents/carers that are the root of why many of these kids go hungry. Irresponsible use of the benefits given to feed kids is a real issue.
While this money is a positive thing, there will be kids missing out due to the root problem.
An excellent example on how to pollute a positive story with ones own political views
Oh the irony and hypocrisy of your words.