There’s literally 0% chance that GTA 6 will flop.yea and it's a massive risk for them, the next game could easily flop.
There’s literally 0% chance that GTA 6 will flop.yea and it's a massive risk for them, the next game could easily flop.
Lol, whut?yea and it's a massive risk for them, the next game could easily flop.
What an astonishly daft thing to say.and the music in reality adds little value to the game, it just triggers nostalgia in older people, the younger generations likely don't care at all.
What other sources? The only thing comparable is GTA V.And no one has shown why the offer they've given is a suitable amount or similar to what he could expect from other sources.
He could also be greedy. We just don't know.By the sounds of it he's not desperate for money, which means he's got no financial incentive to sell the rights for what he considers cheap, and it doesn't seem likely he's a fan of the game so there is likely no personal motive to sell the rights cheap/
What a waste of human resources. The last thing we need are more servers guzzling up power and the associated power from sending that information across the globe, because a bunch of artist want more money.If Rockstar wanted 400 songs in the game as has been said, then one of the other options would be to set up a streaming server somewhere at Rockstar and do a deal to stream the songs for a set period, and if it works out cheaper for rockstar then that's good for them, if it works out that it costs them more then it indicates they were lowballing their offers.
That's a fair point but they got burnt by their records labels that offered them get rich quick contracts. They were then blinded by the dollar signs that they didn't read the fine print.A lot of musicians etc have been burned, often very badly signing contracts that give some the right to use their music indefinitely without further payments so the older and wiser ones tend to be extremely wary of such things.
The thing with songs is that unlike other creative endeavours it is one of the few things people will want to interact with again on a regular basis. No matter how good your photo is nobody is going to want to look at it multiple times a day for a few days in a row. But people will listen to the same song on repeat for 6 hour straight.I find the argument "but you get exposure!" is a non-starter. There is no guarantee that his song being in the game = some kind of explosion of streams. There is a chance, sure, but it is not a guarantee. You cannot guarantee me that is going to happen. Rockstar can't either. Just because it happened to other songs doesn't mean it will happen to his. So without that guarantee, then they need to up their offer.
It really is that simple.
The thing with songs is that unlike other creative endeavours it is one of the few things people will want to interact with again on a regular basis. No matter how good your photo is nobody is going to want to look at it multiple times a day for a few days in a row. But people will listen to the same song on repeat for 6 hour straight.
People who like his song won't be firing up GTA VI just to listen to it, they will go find it elsewhere. I would point to rocket league. The songs (i believe in this case were licensed exclusive for RL) have millions of views on youtube.
Then again, 1 out of 400. Most players will probably never even hear his song.
All the 3D artist that worked to create this game are far more deserving of royalties than a muscian whose song is 1 out of 400.Sharing revenue of 0.01% for each artist at the level of the previous game sales would equate to around $300-400 million overall (or how about 0.005%, still a lot of money for the artists if the game succeeds), of course it won't happen because we love billion dollar companies round ere.
That means the song is worth even lessYes, I am aware of this human behaviour.
Me on the other hand....I turn off the in game radio, it is the first thing I do when I get into a car. The first thing.
All the 3D artist that worked to create this game are far more deserving of royalties than a muscian whose song is 1 out of 400.
That means the song is worth even less
No that's just wrong. We live in a capitalistic market, where everyone dictates how much they think something is worth, to them.Worth less to me has ZERO bearings to what Ware thinks it's worth. I have ZERO right to tell him how much he should charge, neither do you or any of us, or Rockstar.
Indeed, the new revenue model is so good, so successful and so meritocratic that critically acclaimed artists can’t even afford to tour and have to live with their parents! Yay for capitalism.One of the best things about the digital revolution of the past 30 years of so is the way it's affected the revenue models for music.
Frankly there's few people less deserving of the obscene sums of money that the music firms and some musicians used to be able command for simply putting out something, often knocked up in one afternoon in a drug fuelled haze, on yet another physical format.
I can't remember which group it was but there is one where famously no one in the core band actually made any money out of playing a tour (not sure on the merch side of things), the only band member that did was a replacement drummer who was being paid a a flat fee regardless.Indeed, the new revenue model is so good, so successful and so meritocratic that critically acclaimed artists can’t even afford to tour and have to live with their parents! Yay for capitalism.
Lol, whut?
What an astonishly daft thing to say.
Vice city soundtrack anyone?
Indeed, the new revenue model is so good, so successful and so meritocratic that critically acclaimed artists can’t even afford to tour and have to live with their parents! Yay for capitalism.
Martyn Ware will probably regret telling Rockstar to 'go do one', I'm pretty sure every 80's pop and rock star who featured in GTA Vice City saw a massive resurgence of interest in thier back catalogue once that game has been released.
What made you so sure?
Do you have and data to back up your claim in your second sentence? What was the average difference before and after the release of the game?
Since the trailer's Tuesday release, Spotify tells BBC Newsbeat streams for the track have increased 36,979% compared to this time last week.
Obviously not quite an apples to apples comparison because the song in question (Tom Petty's tune Love Is A Long Road). was featured in an advert but it demonstrates the principle that exposure from something as popular as GTA6 can lead to increased revenues elsewhere.
GTA 6: Streams soar for 70s rocker Tom Petty thanks to trailer
Tom Petty's B-side track Love Is A Long Road has seen a near 37,000% increase in streams on Spotify.www.bbc.com
Well, one can cite Kate Bush from Stranger Things as an example too....but I am asking specifically for a game, and not ANY game, but Rockstar GTA Vice CIty. Why? Because that is the example he used specifically.
And EVERY SONG btw, not 1 song, EVERY SONG.
Make a claim, back it up.
He did say he is "pretty sure".
GTA Vice City's soundtrack tends to be at or near the top when it comes to Google SEO results.
Why is GTA Vice City’s soundtrack so iconic?
One of the most common praises for GTA Vice City is its outstanding music and soundtrack.www.sportskeeda.com