it is stealing however you want to cover it up
.
no it's not.
You cannot be arrested for theft for dling a copy of a game.
it is stealing however you want to cover it up
.
I'm going to assume by "stealing" he means theft of intellectual property, which it is.no it's not.
You cannot be arrested for theft for dling a copy of a game.
I'm going to assume by "stealing" he means theft of intellectual property, which it is.
Stealing intellectual property still makes you a thief.BY calling people thieves he's saying it's theft under the law which it is not.
Stealing intellectual property still makes you a thief.
I download TV programmes which is the same crime, I can admit I'm a thief. Why can't you?
It's theft of intellectual property.because if it means your a thief, then that means criminal court, personally i like not being in jail. Also the law says it's not theft.
Walking into a art gallery sitting down and painting a copy, is that theft?
The fact is that morals are 100% subjective.
One could argue piracy is not morally wrong because it's a "victimless crime" and these companies make countless millions/billions anyway, in fact many people do. This is not my view, but do you see the flaw in using morals as an argument?
Laws are not 100% subjective, what a daft thing to say.As are laws.
I was simply demonstrating how morals as an argument are made of complete fail.That's not pertinent to what I'm saying. I'm talking about using something you've bought as you see fit, not downloading something you've not bought for free.
There's nothing comical about logical fallacies, but the fact you find it so funny shows me that you really can't take debate seriously. If you want me to continue this, you're going to have to show me otherwise./ignores the comical 'homework'
I don't really find it shocking that people admit to doing it, but I do find it sad how some of these people will go to any lengths to convince themselves that they're not doing something wrong. I couldn't live with lying to myself like that, if I do something wrong then I man up and admit it.Most people on here are blatently admitting to the fact they download games... Something I find totally shocking.
I cannot believe someone can use the fact that a game checks if its authentic as a reason to not pay for it but still play it.
Agreed.It is not right, however you try to argue it.
u have to connect online everytime you want to play half life, so whats the big fuss?
It's theft of intellectual property.
Did you know that the 'T' in FACT stands for Federation Against Copyright Theft?
u have to connect online everytime you want to play half life, so whats the big fuss?
You're the one who wanted to argue semantics.yet downloading a game is a civil matter and not criminal and not theft.
An anti piracy group choses shocking name! how shocking!
You're the one who wanted to argue semantics.![]()
It's just easier to call it "theft" than "intellectual property infringement".Law's not semantics, massive difference.
like manslaughter and murder.
I cannot believe someone can use the fact that a game checks if its authentic as a reason to not pay for it but still play it.