Massive blast in Beirut

Soldato
Joined
23 Nov 2019
Posts
3,307
Just reroute the Thames temporarily, cover that **** in mega-thicc steel walls and just let it blow up. Easy peasy.

construction of said walls risks setting it off. The tidal wave that the blast would create would jump the thames barrier and flood large swathes of the estuary and up into central london. They're not going to go near it with anything making vibrations. The hope is the seawater is degrading the material enough to render it ineffective. The main concern is the corrosion of the hull that is nearing the point where it could split and allow shells to spill out and clatter against each other. They are not happy about the prospect of all that movement. It's too volatile to get in there and may cause the event you're trying to prevent by doing so. Ergo, waiting game and hope for the best. Not ideal, but all they can do right now really.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jul 2003
Posts
9,595
construction of said walls risks setting it off. The tidal wave that the blast would create would jump the thames barrier and flood large swathes of the estuary and up into central london. They're not going to go near it with anything making vibrations. The hope is the seawater is degrading the material enough to render it ineffective. The main concern is the corrosion of the hull that is nearing the point where it could split and allow shells to spill out and clatter against each other. They are not happy about the prospect of all that movement. It's too volatile to get in there and may cause the event you're trying to prevent by doing so. Ergo, waiting game and hope for the best. Not ideal, but all they can do right now really.


In June 2020, the Department of Transport announced it was looking for a contractor to remove the ship's masts as they were "placing undue strain on the rest of the vessel structure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery

That would be a brown trouser job :eek::p


There is still thought to be a fair amount of high explosives buried at RAF Fauld when up to 4,000 tones of bombs, shells and rifle ammunition exploded in 1944.

"It still has its sad place in the history books as it is the largest non-nuclear explosion ever to have occurred in the world when bombs, shells and rifle ammunition exploded at RAF Fauld."

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/fauld-explosion-ve-day-3579135

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_Fauld_explosion

Although this list puts it second behind the Halifax Explosion in Canada.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large...rtificial_non-nuclear_explosions_by_magnitude
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2005
Posts
17,615
Location
Bristol
further up the page is the ww2 list.
Ahh, I missed that the page was huge and covered such a long date range, in that case I'd wildly speculate (that's what this thread is for, right...) that it wasn't quite as large/devastating as the others as it looks like the casualty list was fairly small compared to a skim read of the ones listed (I did skim so didn't check them all).
 
Back
Top Bottom