MCU to "Refocus” and Disney sinking faster than the Titanic (Starwars is dead Marvel is dead)

It certainly goes after Disney in places, it also goes after silly YouTubers obsessed with woke/Disney etc.

Like nearly always, it doesn't really take a side but satirises everything.
 
ianh said:
Have you?

Do you think that the fictionalised version of KK, who realises her mistakes, acknowledges them to the public and changes her viewpoint, is an actual realistic avatar for the real KK who South Park are genuinely trying to show in a sympathetic light, or is it far more likely that South Park is still skewering KK by showing "this is what we think would happen if KK was a better person.......................but it won't, because she isn't".

Only time will tell if their satirical take on KK in the future is accurate but, based on her actions in the past, does anyone REALLY think the "humanised" version of her shown at the end of the South Park episode is going to accurate to the real KK in the future, someone who publically acknowledges mistakes and changes her viewpoints?
Click to expand...
She’s a witch.

Fat chance
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kyo
ianh said:
Have you?

Do you think that the fictionalised version of KK, who realises her mistakes, acknowledges them to the public and changes her viewpoint, is an actual realistic avatar for the real KK who South Park are genuinely trying to show in a sympathetic light, or is it far more likely that South Park is still skewering KK by showing "this is what we think would happen if KK was a better person.......................but it won't, because she isn't".

Only time will tell if their satirical take on KK in the future is accurate but, based on her actions in the past, does anyone REALLY think the "humanised" version of her shown at the end of the South Park episode is going to accurate to the real KK in the future, someone who publically acknowledges mistakes and changes her viewpoints?
Click to expand...

Personally, I don’t think that’s what it was going for and it wasn’t trying to make any definitive statement on KK or anyone else.

Instead, I think it was simply showing that there are Cartman-like behaviours (and concessions to be made) on ‘both sides of the argument’.

Notably, the show put Stan and Kyle (who represent the ‘common man’ and the ‘flawed intellect’, respectfully) in an uncomfortable conflict, belittling Cartman’s hysterical position but then finding themselves subject to the same absurdity they were belittling.

The show was being critical on all sides.
 
Looks like Gina Carano giving her take, surprised she was under KK and was fully onboard with them at one point.

This is the part where KK demands any YouTubers get censored off of YouTube for sharing and laughing at this hilarious episode, she’ll have YouTube disable the thumbs down option because of the ratio she’ll receive, then she’ll have her publicist ghouls make sure Variety and Hollywood Reporter run hit pieces about the South Park creators and their families smearing their names through every useful idiot she has under her thumb who would sell their soul to work for Lucas film, she’ll activate her online mob to repeat that the South Park creators are racist, bigot, transphobes, and demand the South Park creators publicly apologize by only using words she approves of and finally she’ll demand they subject themselves to a re-education course of 45 people in the lbgtq community zoom call to sit there and listen of how badly they got their feelings hurt all over a little boop of a South Park episode. But maybe just maybe the jig is up.
Click to expand...

 
Last edited:
Do you ever actually consider trying to be honest when you post, rather than posting simply whatever you "think" is the truth irrespective of how inaccurate that is? I mean do you genuinely intend to lie and misinform as a deliberate choice or is it always accidental because you're too (insert various reasons) to actually read what someone actually posted?

Here's the tweet she made, notice something missing compared to your post about what you are claiming she said -

Z73dvID.jpg


At no point does she ever include ANY reference to ANY political party, only YOU have done that.

In fact, she specifically said "How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?" without making ANY reference to a particular "side" or political party and yet you've decided to ignore what she ACTUALLY said so that you can make up something that she DIDN'T say, and so I ask...............why? Why would you want to misinform people? Is it because you disagree with her statement that no-one should be hated for their political views, I'm genuinely curious as to your reasons you could give for deliberately/accidentally making up a lie, then touting that lie as if it were the truth.
 
VincentHanna said:
She was sacked from Mandalorian for saying 'Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…even by children. Because history is edited, most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views,'
Click to expand...
CORRECT!
 
It's pretty clear she was comparing the treatment of Jews then to the treatment of Republicans today when you put it together with the numerous other loony right wing social media posts she got in hot water for, including Covid denial, claiming the vote was fixed, being anti trans etc. She's a well publicised Republican and has actively mocked Democrats, she wasn't looking out for the well being of all people regardless of political beliefs.

I would say I can't believe people are defending her, but I actually can.
 
Last edited:
C Kent said:
Nope, she mocked the NPCs that put pronouns in their twitter bio - and she only did that after months of harassment and bullying fromr the lovely, kind and tolerant left leaning folks.
Click to expand...
Thanks, this provides no evidence at all that she was talking about herself in the above tweet, a lovely friendly Republican (as long as you aren't black, Trans or believe in viruses)
 
Shamikebab said:
Thanks, this provides no evidence at all that she was talking about herself in the above tweet, a lovely friendly Republican (as long as you aren't black, Trans or believe in viruses)
Click to expand...
oh, you are calling her a racist as well now eh, really going for that 'ist bingo card :rolleyes:
 
Peltz getting backing from Perlmutter. They managed to close shop last time Peltz came knocking but pressure is building.
www.barrons.com

Disney Under Fresh Pressure

Nelson Peltz’s push for board seats at Walt Disney gets support from former Marvel executive Isaac Perlmutter, according to The Wall Street Journal.
www.barrons.com www.barrons.com

Also just noticed the budget for Snowwhite is already at 330millon lol. Let’s blame the virus never mind the massive reshoots it’s going through.
 
Bigpig said:
Peltz getting backing from Perlmutter. They managed to close shop last time Peltz came knocking but pressure is building.
www.barrons.com

Disney Under Fresh Pressure

Nelson Peltz’s push for board seats at Walt Disney gets support from former Marvel executive Isaac Perlmutter, according to The Wall Street Journal.
www.barrons.com www.barrons.com

Also just noticed the budget for Snowwhite is already at 330millon lol. Let’s blame the virus never mind the massive reshoots it’s going through.
Click to expand...
Just read that they are getting rid of the 7 baristas they had previously decided on and will now cgi actual dwarves in...expect that budget to jump by another 100m plus!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom