Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 7,607
Omnonomnomnomnom!
Omnonomnomnomnom!
I have a fully electronic CSI distributor on my 1.8.I think the 4 barrel will more tuneable than the injection, especially for any future upgradesI have a fully electronic CSI distributor on my 1.8.

wow, great build. I can imagine driving that thing will be very "interesting" with that heavy lump sitting up front! fun though
It might be just the angle of the photo but the front break lines seem to be pretty close to the exhuast headers? if so that might warm up the fluid a bit leading to early brake fade?
Interesting in what way? Engine is very comparable in weight to the one removed, around 20kg lighter for stock items. That's one of the reasons the MGB GT V8 was considered a much more balanced vehicle when compared to the MGC with it's straight 6. The combo also saw the light of day again with the MG-RV8 in the early 90's.
Ahh I just presumed it would be a much heavier front end and turn in would be "wooly" but it seems not, good stuff
I've also lost a fair amount of weight by removing the front and rear "rubber" bumpers. Unlike the vision the name suggests, they're actually made of some fairly heavy metal sections bolted on the front and the back of the car, so that should sharpen things up a little too. 20KG off the front and even more off the back!wow, great build. I can imagine driving that thing will be very "interesting" with that heavy lump sitting up front! fun though![]()
) and in the US they fit all kinds of v8s and v6s. The MGB also had factory 3.5 v8s etc. The MGC suffered from having a big heavy lump up front but even that got sorted with more modern tyres and tuning.
Plus my summer wheels too

