Milo/UC Berkley protestors stop 'hate speech' by using violence and hate...

StriderX · 27 Feb 2017 at 13:07

There is a distinct hypocritical nature on the left of both saying that racial characteristics aren't an issue and are at the same time, i mean... sigh... in the US, the left (visible left, apathetic left aren't useful) constantly go on and on about black issues being a white persons problem... Language and science suit people at different moments in an argument, you can even see several videos of an extreme minority of leftist idiots where they will actively contradict themselves. This is also an issue with the right, but people tend to expect it there.

The biggest loss in the 21st century is the ability to have a discussion without it having to be filled with "just joking", just to get some point across and leave as soon as possible to not waste ones time.

hurfdurf · 5 Mar 2017 at 03:07

Guy at a protest gets aggressive and starts shouting "Do something".

https://twitter.com/YourAnonCentral/status/838173526905479168

Someone obliges.

I love how visceral politics has become.

Obviously its an extremely cowardly, wrong and reprehensible act to pepper spray a silly right wing old man at what appears to be a peaceful support Trump rally, but at the same time, LOL.

10 arrested. Hope they got who ever got the old man.

Zatoichi.uK · 5 Mar 2017 at 07:13

People really need to learn how to debate without being highjacked by emotion.

h4rm0ny · 5 Mar 2017 at 13:14

I get suspicious any time the start of an exchange is cut off from the video. We don't know what the other guy said or how much the guy was goaded before that. It could be nothing, it could ten minutes of debate before the older man loses his temper and tells the other one to **** off. We don't know if the old man went up to the younger one or the other way around. Basically, show the whole thing.

And regardless, what is "LOL" about someone being assaulted?

CREATIVE!11 · 5 Mar 2017 at 13:28

I don't know if you've all noticed it, but I certainly have noticed something in the last 5 years...

Politics has become increasingly toxic from both sides.... it's just aids now. This Trump election has really taken the cake.

hurfdurf · 5 Mar 2017 at 14:34

h4rm0ny said:
And regardless, what is "LOL" about someone being assaulted?

Taken by itself I find the idea of someone repeatedly saying "do something" in an agressive manner then crying around on the floor when someone does hilarious.

dowie · 5 Mar 2017 at 14:49

What does the above have to do with Milo?

Is the old angry guy a 'Nazi' too?

Sankari · 2 Dec 2018 at 11:40

Resurrecting this thread to share some interesting documents that show Milo is currently teetering on the brink of financial ruin. Turns out he's been very good at collecting other people's money, but not so good at paying his debts.

Milo has been haemorrhaging money ever since his fall from grace in 2016. Multiple attempts to create alternative revenue streams have failed dismally. Despite this he has continued spending like a drunken sailor.

Milo has a history of grifting, mooching, and generally screwing up. Examples include:

* The Kernel (online tech magazine): started in 2011, collapsed insolvent in 2013
* Breitbart Tech: appointed editor in 2015, resigned in 2017
* Yiannopoulos Privilege Grant: created in 2016, collected almost $400,000 from donors collapsed in 2018 due to gross financial mismanagement; not a single grant was ever issued
* Dangerous: a book ostensibly authored by Milo (though he paid Allum Bokhari $100,000 to work on the manuscript); intended to be published by Simon & Schuster in 2017, but the publishers dropped it like a hot rock after Milo's paedophile comments emerged, and he did not get a single penny from his subsequent settlement
* Milo, Inc.: created in 2017, still running but leaking cash like a sieve

dowie said:
Other thing is... with all this controversy in the media and his book being dropped by the publishers he's probably going to get a bigger book deal and even more sales now.

He was forced to self-publish it because nobody would give him a book deal!

h4rm0ny · 2 Dec 2018 at 14:04

He was destroyed over something he never said. It was widely reported with great glee by his detractors that he'd spoken in favour of paedophilia. He never did.

Diddums · 2 Dec 2018 at 14:10

All of these people are idiots and the sooner they get bored and **** off, the better. Joe Rogan and his podcast, Milo Poppadoms and his and that other professor who spends all his time "rekking feminists", just **** off, all of them.

The reason we have all the SJW / PC rubbish is because these idiots give them a voice, a podium, and legitimize their incessant whinging by arguing with them.

When someone says something like "you need to pull that video of a woman getting beaten in a videogame off youtube because it's sexist" you don't engage with them, you roll your eyes, tell them to shut the **** up and get on with life. They'll soon get bored and realise that beyond their little echo chambers nobody cares about their opinions.

StriderX · 2 Dec 2018 at 14:34

Strange how the only gay alt-righter is in trouble... it's almost as if they realised he was gay.

Sankari · 2 Dec 2018 at 16:19

h4rm0ny said:
He was destroyed over something he never said. It was widely reported with great glee by his detractors that he'd spoken in favour of paedophilia. He never did.

In the interview in a January 2016 episode of the podcast Drunken Peasants, Yiannopoulos stated that sexual relationships between 13-year-old boys and adult men and women can "happen perfectly consensually", because some 13-year-olds are, in his view, sexually and emotionally mature enough to consent to sex with adults; he spoke favourably both of gay 13-year-old boys having sex with adult men and straight 13-year-old boys having sex with adult women.

He used his own experience as an example, saying he was mature enough to be capable of giving consent at a young age. He also stated that "paedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old, who is sexually mature" but rather that "paedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty.

(Source).

Sankari · 2 Dec 2018 at 16:29

StriderX said:
Strange how the only gay alt-righter is in trouble... it's almost as if they realised he was gay.

Dave Rubin is gay and alt right, and he makes $27,000 a month from his YouTube channel. They don't care that he's gay.

StriderX · 2 Dec 2018 at 16:46

Evangelion said:
Dave Rubin is gay and alt right, and he makes $27,000 a month from his YouTube channel. They don't care that he's gay.

Not quite as overtly camp and sexually oppressive as Milo seems to be though.

Zatoichi.uK · 2 Dec 2018 at 17:29

Evangelion said:
Dave Rubin is gay and alt right, and he makes $27,000 a month from his YouTube channel. They don't care that he's gay.

Alt right? How so?

plasmahal · 2 Dec 2018 at 18:38

Evangelion said:
Dave Rubin is gay and alt right, and he makes $27,000 a month from his YouTube channel. They don't care that he's gay.

Dave Rubin is far from being alt-right, if he's alt-right so are you.

He's libertarian by his own words.

If you have a source where he states he's alt-right, then post, but as it doesn't exist, your pathetic for saying so.

mmj_uk · 2 Dec 2018 at 18:44

Very few people who are called alt/far right are actually alt/far right, they're just a derogatory term that the far left use against anyone they see as threats. He stands in opposition to the far left and gives a platform to a broad spectrum of people including conservatives and that's all it really takes to be (mis)labelled as alt/far right by the left these days.

stockhausen · 2 Dec 2018 at 19:12

Very few people who are called far left are actually far left, they're just a derogatory term that the alt/far right use against anyone they see as threats.

RaohNS · 2 Dec 2018 at 19:14

Diddums said:
All of these people are idiots and the sooner they get bored and **** off, the better. Joe Rogan and his podcast, Milo Poppadoms and his and that other professor who spends all his time "rekking feminists", just **** off, all of them.

How about people like you do the same? People who watch people like Rogan are interested in what other people have to say, strange I know. Rogan has all sorts of interesting people on his show. He has his opinions (not allowed you say), and he shares his ideas and uses the view of keeping an open mind.

Milo, meh he was a ***** but had some point. And made some. His comments while I didn't agree with them are certainly in my view not overtly embracing paedophilia but tried to explain his view based on personal actions.

As for Professor Jordan Peterson, you ignore him because you are both arrogant and ignorant. He has a message that holds a great deal of interest. This is because ironically people like yourself constantly disparage and "complain" while not listening to anything the man has to say. And then like some Muppet might make a comment "did you clean your room" :rolleyes:

Yeah like I've never heard that before and it isn't even funny.

The reason we have all the SJW / PC rubbish is because these idiots give them a voice, a podium, and legitimize their incessant whinging by arguing with them.

The reason they exist is because people have different interests. Nothing more nothing less. That's simple to understand too. My 12 yo step daughter made the comment in as much vain as that.

Evangelion said:
Dave Rubin is gay and alt right, and he makes $27,000 a month from his YouTube channel. They don't care that he's gay.

No he isn't in any way alt right Evan. Stop telling blatant lies. The guy is gay. Alt righters hate gays. He is Jewish. Alt righters hate Jews.

You've really gone down in your game since Syria because you are so blinded by something that is obvious.

Zatoichi.uK · 2 Dec 2018 at 19:24

Lazy mudslinging at best. This is in part why people are listening to alternative viewpoints as all people can come up with to dispute remotely controversial claims is name calling.

Milo/UC Berkley protestors stop 'hate speech' by using violence and hate...

Capodecina