Milo/UC Berkley protestors stop 'hate speech' by using violence and hate...

Fair enough. But does he not speak the truth?

Sometimes, he also cherry picks facts to support his politics and generally tries to be as offensive as possible. He's a bit of a dick but he's not a facist or a white nationalist.
 
He criticised the movie for being terrible and got banned from Twitter because of what people who follow him said to the actress, he didn't agree with the things they were saying at all, nor did he post anything abusive or out of order.

This is not true.
 
And back to reality, just listen to the vile hatred spewed by this Nazi woman, the assault on her is totally deserved... (well in the mind of herp derp at least)


The guy interviewing her was the man that sprayed her? I never did see who it was. I just assumed it was another person standing next to him.
 
How? You're not making any sense, he's criticised Islam so he's fascist? AFAIK the guy is a libertarian who has been quite rude in his criticisms of feminism, Islam and priveledge/identity politics - all that combined doesn't seem to make someone a facist. He's rude and offensive sure but you're just using facist as a throwaway term here and have provided no good argument for it.

He is a fascist as anyone who criticises him he immediately trolls them with his followers and they end up quiet which is what he wants. His way, his view is right and the rest are all wrong.

It's not just polite criticism, him and his ilk stir up hatred against minorities.
 
How is he doing that? Trump is a big Israeli supporter AFAIK, the college events Milo speaks at are organised by student Republican groups. You seem to have made a circular argument in labelling him a facist then concluding that people watching him are facist and therefore hate jews(despite going to an event hosted by a gay person with Jewish heritage who is quite open about his relationships with black men).

I think what you'll actually find is that right wing racist types don't like Milo very much

I know they don't like him, don't think you read my post properly. He defends the alt right, never criticises them and it is sickening as he is from a minority group.

Don't give a crap about him dating black men, don't mean he isn't a hate peddling pos.
 
Again that video it goes deeper than politics. That guy is in my unprofessional opinion, a complete woman hater because he has spent, looking at him, his entire life being shunned by pretty girls like her. This is his one moment to vent all his pent up sexual frustration. Political opinion is just a small part of his problem.
Efour Freud
 
Have you even read the article you posted? The only thing he did was criticise her grammar. What did he post that was abusive? All you've done is post unsubstantiated claims in this thread

As posted further up:

He said she was simply playing the victim, when in actual fact he knew full well she was being subjected to a torrent of racist abuse.

You said "nor did he post anything abusive or out of order. "

That is pretty out of order if you ask me.

Why wade in and say something like that to someone who is being racially abused like she was?
 
He is a fascist as anyone who criticises him he immediately trolls them with his followers and they end up quiet which is what he wants. His way, his view is right and the rest are all wrong.

It's not just polite criticism, him and his ilk stir up hatred against minorities.

He's a facist because people who follow him attack people he doesn't like? You've basically just defined almost every celeb on twitter who has has a feud with another celeb as a facist in that case.

Basically you're trying to say you don't like him, that's cool I think he's a dick too. But calling him a facist because you don't like him is just silly.
 
Within every eloborate lie is a kernel of truth. But that's irrelevant. Milo doesn't care about the truth, he cares about saying the things that will get him the most attention. He's a self-styled cult leader who preys on the disenfranchised.

If thats true why do the university conference circuit and not the tv chatshow one? Like kate Hopkins
 
1bbra7nkppdy.jpg


5veh7iegvpdy.jpg

Ahhh i get it now what hurduf is sayinf is that wr should violently beat up these people?

oP8b0q4.jpg

You should be careful posting things like that hurf you could be done with inciting religious/political hatred calling for peoplw to bruttaly beat those who they dissagree with.
 
Ahhh i get it now what hurduf is sayinf is that wr should violently beat up these people?

oP8b0q4.jpg

You should be careful posting things like that hurf you could be done with inciting religious/political hatred calling for peoplw to bruttaly beat those who they dissagree with.

You could agree with what he was saying if the people he was directing it at had ever threatened to harm a group of people based on their race or religion, these days protecting your borders is considered racist.
 
If thats true why do the university conference circuit and not the tv chatshow one? Like kate Hopkins

Because he is an incredibly gifted orator and devilishly intelligent to be frank.
He's just a freakshow to Americans. An openly gay, British, currently republican loving, anti semitic, self loathing sideshow.
Every now and then a Brit conquers the US media, usually via hideous chat or reality music shows. He is having his 15mins he'll make it to mainstream TV for a few months and earn a few million in the process, he knows it, he has his eyes on the prize.
He knows the format very well too after his experiences at university.
 
Last edited:
Because his target audience doesn't watch broadcast TV?


but everyone keeps saying is target market is white trash basically, so the biggest TV demographic.

Because he is an incredibly gifted orator and devilishly intelligent to be frank.
He's just a freakshow to Americans. An openly gay, British, currently republican loving, anti semitic, self loathing sideshow.
Every now and then a Brit conquers the US media, usually via hideous chat or reality music shows. He is having his 15mins he'll make it to mainstream TV for a few months and earn a few million in the process, he knows it, he has his eyes on the prize.
He knows the format very well too after his experiences at university.


if he wantyed mon ey so bad he'd be doing the hopkins approach.
 
Ahhh i get it now what hurduf is sayinf is that wr should violently beat up these people?

oP8b0q4.jpg

You should be careful posting things like that hurf you could be done with inciting religious/political hatred calling for peoplw to bruttaly beat those who they dissagree with.

No need to be careful, don't be scared homie.

I'd happily beat anyone who threatened me in such a way face to face, no matter their race, religion or politics.
 
Yes it was the Allies who were the true Nazi's in WW2, not allowing their freedom of speech and what not, resorting to violence to stop them as well, disgraceful.

You'd have a point if the Allies were the aggressors, the Allies were the only ones forbidding freedom of speech, the Allies were the only ones resorting to violence, etc, etc. But in the real world you have no point at all.

The irrational prejudice, discrimination, violence, intimidation and authoritarianism of the side you favour puts it much closer to the Nazis than to the Allies.
 
Back
Top Bottom