I disagree, tires in dirty air tend to 'scrub' more.
Jay
Because this track is 22% time on throttle, it's slow corners, there is a lot of breaking but they are short breaking zones because you're breaking from 150kph or 80kph to 40kph rather than 300kph to 60-80kph.
At previous races the softs/supersofts could do way way more than half race distance easily, softs could probably do 60+ laps easily.
Don't forget that this track is short, this track is much shorter distance than every other track, 40 laps here is pretty much 20-25laps anywhere else but those laps at other tracks are at full speed. 40 laps here is probably equivalent to 15 laps at many other tracks in terms of tire wear.
Surely the ultrasoft isn't particularly soft if it's lasting this long? No wonder Hamilton said the compound isn't particularly sticky.
I wonder what happened to Rosberg? No performance at all. Good call by Mercedes, they must really have Rosberg under their thumb.
That was a funny comment - surely they shouldn't be surprised by their own tyre!
Did he gain an advantage? Ricciardo was closer after the corner than before it.
he didn't lose position as he would have done if went around the corner while he locked up
Indeed,
"Perelli road tyres, your choice if you want a surprise, or a tree"
It could just be that hes not very good.
It isn't just that. The softs are faster than the ultrasofts.
I wonder what happened to Rosberg? No performance at all. Good call by Mercedes, they must really have Rosberg under their thumb.
he didn't lose position as he would have done if went around the corner while he locked up
How do Pirelli test these tyres these days though? Can't still be trundling round with an old Toyota when developing them surely?
Or is it all blind guesswork and taking data from when the real cars run them?
How do Pirelli test these tyres these days though? Can't still be trundling round with an old Toyota when developing them surely?
Or is it all blind guesswork and taking data from when the real cars run them?