• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Monster Hunter Online benchmark thread

r7slayer said:
Poor? i bought a 290x when they first came out with aftermarket coolers. Was around the £450 mark, not exactly poor!

Guess i hit a fanboy nerve lol. I would never pay for more for less when im currently buying GPU i go for the best performance/price and that's what i did.

Shame you get nVidia gameworks and other nVidia partners which intentionally try to cripple AMD anyway they can.

Stunning...
Click to expand...

When someone follows up with on a more serious note it normally means it was light hearted. Your obsession clouds your thinking. Welcome to the ignore list.
 
LOL,the whole people who are rich can afford Nvidia, was part of the original marketing line from the Nvidia Focus Group lot nearly 10 years ago. Rollo used that so many times on so many sites.
Its funny when even yonks ago cards like the ATI X1950XTX were retarded money.

BTW,my GTX660 cost me less than an HD7850,and GTX660 cards at that point were generally cheaper than the HD7870. I am not a worthy Nvidia card owner it seems! Sulks in corner.
 
Last edited:
MHO_R290.png


Radeon R9-290 1170/1600 |Catalyst 14.12 Omega
Intel 4790K @4800

The fps tanks in the drinking pool scene and when the crossbow is drawn near the end. A lot of screen tearing going making it almost un watchable when its heavily zoomed in.
 
Kaapstad said:
Is it worth doing a proper ranking benchmark thread for this for resolutions like 1080p etc.
Click to expand...
May be, but probably it'd best to keep the Nvida ranking and AMD ranking as separate entries.

Looking at the results of the AMD 290/290x users, it would seem that the CPU that they use (i.e. more cores) would matter more than Nvidia users. Read elsewhere some people are saying how this benchmark is probably with the engine's own physic removed/omitted and replaced by Nvidia's PhysX, so any AMD users would have the PhysX forced to be ran on their CPU instead, thus possibly the reason why AMD card performance seem to be tanking so badly, and underperform to Nvidia in this benchmark by so much.
 
Last edited:
Marine-RX179 said:
May be, but probably it'd best to keep the Nvida ranking and AMD ranking as separate entries.

Looking at the results of the AMD 290/290x users, it would seem that the CPU that they use (i.e. more cores) would matter more than Nvidia users. Read elsewhere some people are saying how this benchmark is probably with the engine's own physic removed/omitted and replaced by Nvidia's PhysX, so any AMD users would have the PhysX forced to be ran on their CPU instead, thus possibly the reason why AMD card performance seem to be tanking so badly, and underperform to Nvidia in this benchmark by so much.
Click to expand...

We need to ask Cooper if he wants to do one first as he started the thread.

But yes keeping the AMD and NVidia entries separate is probably a good idea.
 
Marine-RX179 said:
I have tried running duplicate on my monitor and TV at the same, and had no crashing problem.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's not the dual displays. I've disabled the 2nd display and still the same issue. Screen one goes blank while the 2nd screen (if active) keeps switching between 720p and full resolution. With a single display it just goes blank. Task manager doesn't work, but I can ctrl-alt-delete and log off.

Tried disabling crossfire, vsr and the like. Managed to get it to run with a single GPU, but it appeared tiny (probably only about 320px wide) in the middle of the screen. Some sort of scaling issue. Not too bothered. Too much hassle for (what will be) minimal reward and everything else works fine.
 
Last edited:
Yer, probably best to seperate AMD from nVidia as AMD are getting a proper sound beating in this. We might have to do the same in the other threads as well, as it just isn't fair :D
 
Its not a fair fight though Greg is it?

Where's the credibility in running it if we in a very short space of time have highlighted that if your card is manufactured by nvidia (ignoring the advertising on the startup sequence *cough) you get a bonus score! :P

If this was a few months back posted by LtMatt with bias to AMD cards you would be getting the pitch forks out ;)
 
Th0nt said:
Its not a fair fight though Greg is it?

Where's the credibility in running it if we in a very short space of time have highlighted that if your card is manufactured by nvidia (ignoring the advertising on the startup sequence *cough) you get a bonus score! :P

If this was a few months back posted by LtMatt with bias to AMD cards you would be getting the pitch forks out ;)
Click to expand...

I don't really care and was just jesting. I am sure AMD will get some drivers out for this soon enough and as for this being AMD biased, I remember running the Star Swarm bench thread and it was heavily AMD biased till you fiddled with a setting which brought nVidia GPUs up from 30-40% usage to 80-90% usage and that went massively pair shaped.
 
Might aswell seperate all the games that are sponsored by amd aswell as its not a fair fight still getting beat by nvidia and dx11:rolleyes:

Thinking about it, its a game that not many people are going to buy anyway, imo.
 
Last edited:
Ian Evey said:
Might aswell seperate all the games that are sponsored by amd aswell as its not a fair fight still getting beat by nvidia and dx11:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
If you can find any "AMD sponsered games" benchmark which a 7870 is faster than a GTX780/780Ti/970 like the GTX660 is faster than 290/290x here, then Nvidia and AMD cards indeed should get seperate entries for the ranking...though I doubt there's any benchmark that match that criteria :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom