Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,738
- Location
- Planet Earth
£100 isn't £70 though, and the 1050 uses more watts. If a new 1030 does what I want why do I need to pay more for a secondhand card that uses more electricity (I may as well take up mining if I want to be environmentally unfriendly), as I said the 1030 isn't for everyone, but it suits me
It can be undervolted too,as the GP107 was made mostly for laptops,and the GTX1050 is bus powered. I am running a TDP capped Core i5 10400 and a GTX960 4GB in 5.7 litre Velka 5 case and it works reasonably fine,and with old games you will cap the FPS anyway,as things such as physics can go wonky,so realistically power would be lower than if you are running a much newer game.
If anything using parts for longer is better for the environment - production is probably a much more important environmental factor in pollution!
Having said that I remember the passively cooled GT1030 actually was slower than the actively cooled one! This was because in some reviews the GT1030 was soundly beaten by an RX550 and others they traded blows!