Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Apr 2003
- Posts
- 3,938
- Location
- InterZone
Psyk said:I'd like to hear the argument for that. I suppose it's probably because it's the only new console that really changes how you play games. But if that's your definition of a console generation then really saturn/ps1/ps2/xbox were all the same gen, as were NES/SNES/Master System/Megadrive.
I'd say that the Wii is next gen because the 'generation' is really about when the console comes out rather than how powerful it is. Since it came out around the same sort of time as 360 and PS3, it's in the same generation.
I always think that a "nex-gen" system should push the boundaries of gaming. Otherwise why do we bother upgrading? Sure companies will push better graphics on us and developers will stop developing so many titles for the older systems which makes us pretty compelled to upgrade our systems every few years just to keep playing the latest games. But how exactly are the PS3 and the 360 "next-gen"? How have they pushed the boundaries? I don't think they have. All they offer is better graphics and online multiplayer pretty as standard. I'd argue that the Wii is the only system that has pushed the envelope by changing the way we play and how games are perceived by non-gamers. Wii is a completely new concept really whereas the other systems are just bigger and better than what we had 5 years ago.
I don't own a Wii by the way, just a 360. I'd like to get one in the future though.