FIA has not not yet been involved or investigated it yet though.
"What we will do now is refer it to the FIA in its totality and it is up to the FIA to decide if there is anything that needs to be taken further,"
This seems to have completely passed me by. I wasn't aware of any legal fights between FI and Caterham?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98416
Interesting that when McLaren are found to have been illegally in possession of Ferrari's IP, they get excluded from the championship and handed the biggest fine in the sports history. Yet when Caterham are found to have been illegally using FI's IP, FI get 25,000 Euros and told to go on their way...
Yup, but that headline sells less papers/gets less website hits.So it sounds like its far more copyright infringement rather than industrial espionage.
ps3ud0
So it sounds like its far more copyright infringement rather than industrial espionage, unless it known (and provable) how they got access to FI parts/designs in the first place?
ps3ud0
And less knee jerk it seems...Yup, but that headline sells less papers/gets less website hits.
So the whole comparison to Spygate is null and void?
Bahrain chief unable to guarantee safety for grand prix in April
The safety of fans cannot be guaranteed at the Bahrain grand prix, according to the president of the country's Automobile Federation.
But he called on F1 to help unify his country when the race returns in April - after it was cancelled in 2011.
"There are disturbances, and youths, who need to be handled in a proper and right way," Sheikh Abdullah bin Isa Al Khalifa told PA Sport.
"There are no guarantees. You could be anywhere, even Silverstone."