Motorsport Off Topic Thread

FrankJH said:
Surely the energy storage is the part of the unit where the battery acid is, admittedly not for a while but there have been cases where the acid has leaked and to have this location stipulated in the rules does seem a little strange on the FIA 's part.
Click to expand...

I doubt they use Lead Acid batteries?

LiOn apparently, or possibly 'SuperCaps' (capacitors in the KERs not for the whole car)
 
Last edited:
FrankJH said:
Thank you Skeeter that was very interesting indeed, much appreciated

I do find it fascinating (and a bit of added danger surely) that the ES is a seperate unit, although I guess the least interesting part of the KERS /ERS from a technical pov. Surely the energy storage is the part of the unit where the battery acid is, admittedly not for a while but there have been cases where the acid has leaked and to have this location stipulated in the rules does seem a little strange on the FIA 's part.

In one sense its ideal for the teams, from the weight distribution pov - but I wonder how many drivers are equally as happy......
Click to expand...

I think its for 2 reasons.

Firstly the engines for 2014 have standardised mounting points and must fit within a standardised 'box'. The ES is not subject to this, meaning teams/manufacturers can design them however they like. I assume its to promote development in battery technology, and also allow a variety of storage devices such as capacitors or even flywheels. It would be to restrictive to lock them into a size/shape and positioning of the ES.

And secondly, safety. With these things potentially containing huge amounts of electric charge or high speed rotating parts they want them stored within the safety cell to stop them flying off in an accident. The thought of a 100,000RPM flywheel flying into the crowd doesn't bear thinking about.
 
Skeeter, that was a bloody great explanation. so much more to it than I thought and very very interesting.

Is the expectation that the new engines + ERS are going to kick out more power than current spec engines without any impact to reliability?
 
Tenzo said:
Is the expectation that the new engines + ERS are going to kick out more power than current spec engines without any impact to reliability?
Click to expand...

I think the aim is to produce about the same power, so say 600bhp from the V6 plus the additional 160bhp from the ERS.

We won't know the specifics until the engines run in anger, and even then I doubt any manufacturer will openly give us all the details.

There is massive potential for field spread and major disparity in the engines performance. However, as with most things in F1, these are clever people and they will likely all converge on the same solutions to the same problems eventually. I think the biggest differentiator between the power units will be reliability, rather than performance.
 
Skeeter said:
I think its for 2 reasons.

Firstly the engines for 2014 have standardised mounting points and must fit within a standardised 'box'. The ES is not subject to this, meaning teams/manufacturers can design them however they like. I assume its to promote development in battery technology, and also allow a variety of storage devices such as capacitors or even flywheels. It would be to restrictive to lock them into a size/shape and positioning of the ES.

And secondly, safety. With these things potentially containing huge amounts of electric charge or high speed rotating parts they want them stored within the safety cell to stop them flying off in an accident. The thought of a 100,000RPM flywheel flying into the crowd doesn't bear thinking about.
Click to expand...

I went to a presentation by Flybrid *iirc* about the flywheel hybrid system. It's a 5kg wheel spinning in excess of 100'000rpm. It had been tested to 20g impacts and passed ok, and was designed to be safe in an 80g impact.

Didn't want to answer my question on 200g impact though. Thats the highest G that has been experienced in a race car accident and survived.

I not keen on getting in a car that has one.
 
I was going to say I've heard about crashes with peak Gs of over 100. I really wouldn't fancy a flywheel ERS system. Far, far too much potential energy for my liking.
 
Flibster said:
I not keen on getting in a car that has one.
Click to expand...

Your passenger for todays is... 100,000RPM of spinning death!

timandrew_YWG-0267-600x400.jpg


Thats the 911 RSR Hybrid. The 918 Racer concept has it in the same spot, and the flywheel in the Audi R18 Hybrids is in the cockpit too, so I assume they must be fairly safe...

Would still give me the heeby jeebies though.
 
Until they've survived a 200g impact without the structure failing, I'm not convinced.

Then again, I'm not overly convinced in the safety of the current KERS systems in F1. BMW mechanic getting electrocuted, Kimi having to leap out of the car, mechanics and marshals having to wear rubber gloves...
 
Looks like McLaren could be going with Honda engines in 2015 linky


Bernie eyeing a return to South Africa with a race in Cape town and 22 races linky
Haven't had a race in SA since Kyalami '93


Hamilton's dog secures paddock pass linky lol
 
Flibster said:
Until they've survived a 200g impact without the structure failing, I'm not convinced.

Then again, I'm not overly convinced in the safety of the current KERS systems in F1. BMW mechanic getting electrocuted, Kimi having to leap out of the car, mechanics and marshals having to wear rubber gloves...
Click to expand...

All drivers are taught to jump from the car if there is any sign of a KERS failure.
 
I remember a driver at last years Le Mans (can't remember who) saying that the whine from the passenger ERS system in the Porsche was very disconcerting to start with, but that you do get used to it*


*'it' in this case I presume to be 'pending quadroplegia'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom