MP Jo Cox murdered in West Yorkshire [Thread title edited]

24 pages of excusing a terrorist as being a 'nutter', pathetic and not surprising as many I bet share his same views on here going by past readings.

What was the title before it got edited? "brown Muslim terrorist kills MP"?
I missed those posts, please could you enlighten me where people may have said 'I excuse this man because he has mental health issues'.

And all murders/killing/attacks are now 'terrorism' by default are they?
 
Not really. All three come from exactly the same ideological viewpoint. What difference does it make whether he's part of a particular minor group of nasty racists with a effective social media arm? All three versions are expressing the same set of beliefs.

No they don't.

You could be ideologically opposed to Mair and use the phrase Britain First, Britain first or Put Britain first.
 
No they don't.

You could be ideologically opposed to Mair and use the phrase Britain First, Britain first or Put Britain first.

And you could go round in circles all day long arguing semantics.

It's pretty clear given the words spoken by this guy in his court appearance today that the murder he committed was politically motivated. To what extent that is compounded by mental illness remains to be seen.
 
yet a right-wing white dude does it and we need to wrap him up in cotton-wool and baby him to the nearest mental ward.
Or perhaps we're trying to establish what, why and how the guy came to do what he has done, just because he has mental health issues and the general consensus is he's been let down by the state in that regard, doesn't mean we are babying him in cotton wool.
 
You could be ideologically opposed to Mair and use the phrase Britain First, Britain first or Put Britain first.

While shooting a pro-Remain MP known for her vocal support for refugees in the face? I don't think so. Add it to what he said today in court - "Death to traitors, freedom for Britain" - and I think it becomes completely absurd to suggest he meant anything different.
 
I just love the xenophobia on this forum.

Depresses **** out of me, not the racism.just the factual wrongness upon which it's based, as far as I'm aware for instance there's been no leftwing terrorism in Europe since NATO abandoned gladio b, unless you count the sham socialism of groups like the RIRA.
 
While shooting a pro-Remain MP known for her vocal support for refugees in the face? I don't think so. Add it to what he said today in court - "Death to traitors, freedom for Britain" - and I think it becomes completely absurd to suggest he meant anything different.

I agree, but that is becasue we now have more evidence.
 

There is absolutely no proof or evidence to back up the assertion "anyone who commits murder ha dmental health issues".

A large part of that is also going to be confused by your hse of a legal term


Is it only illegal killings that are done by the mentally ill?

Legal killings however are not covered?

IE two criminal gangs are fighting over territory one of the members of the first gang murders a dealer working for the second gang.

By your definition he must be mentally ill.


A soldier sent by his comanders to fight and kill people he's never even met.

Not mentally ill by your definition
 
What was the title before it got edited? "brown Muslim terrorist kills MP"?

It was "Possible shooting and stabbings in West Yorkshire" so as more information became available it was reasonable to amend. It notes that the title was edited in case earlier comments related to that title.

I saw the Canadian MP Nathan Cullen attempting to pay tribute to her in Parliament and it was the most touching thing I've seen regarding this whole mess.

Poor chap was really struggling but impressive to express himself as well as he did.
 
I'm bored of humanity these days to be quite frank...

When will the day come people cease being retarded and doing **** like this?

There is absolutely no proof or evidence to back up the assertion "anyone who commits murder ha dmental health issues".

A large part of that is also going to be confused by your hse of a legal term


Is it only illegal killings that are done by the mentally ill?

Legal killings however are not covered?

IE two criminal gangs are fighting over territory one of the members of the first gang murders a dealer working for the second gang.

By your definition he must be mentally ill.


A soldier sent by his comanders to fight and kill people he's never even met.

Not mentally ill by your definition

Lmao your sig.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised people are so keen to argue over the motivations of this man, and who is to blame.

Mental health issues have most likely played a strong part in this, and this would be directly linked to him believing and ultimately acting on rhetoric being spouted by the likes of Britain First, the BNP, or even UKIP. If this is indeed what has happened.

I do understand the frustrations of people with regards to the media labelling him a terrorist or not, they tend to steer clear of that if the person in question is white (and not a Muslim).
 
Back
Top Bottom