what was the name of the first one to set foot on are shores?
Amir!!!
what was name of last 1 to get deported?
Asif!!!
only1s i could think of what aint racist or against rules
you can't be racist against a religion
what was the name of the first one to set foot on are shores?
Amir!!!
what was name of last 1 to get deported?
Asif!!!
only1s i could think of what aint racist or against rules
you can't be racist against a religion
we need a cull.
Gnargh I hate it when people are pedant about that. Its obvious what they mean.
I knew what you did was somewhat tongue in cheek, but, ugh, pedantness.
we need a cull.
We need to learn to live with each other.
Just read this article
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1683635.ece
What are your views etc on this matter, i personally think its a total joke how these idiots are allowed to get away with it
I assure you my spelling and / or grammar mistakes were quite unintentionalNearly got me with that but I'm going to leave it for another pedant.
CBS' quick guide to ignoring the problem
1) Insist the only problem is a very specific behaviour, and only a minority are responsible. There are many ways to achieve this, you could convince yourself that the problem is isolated to a seperate and different group called 'extremists' and then, without knowing how many people actually do it, tell yourself only a tiny minority of people do it.
2) Insist its not an issue, despite the fact that you feel the urgent need to tell people its not an issue frequently. This can include dismissing growing political power by suggesting its a measure of equality, by comparing the growing political presence to something you're already comfortable with. For example, if Hizb-ut-Tahir bother you, pretend they're comparable to the Green party. The Greens are no threat, ho ho ho!
3) Legitimise the actions of those we fear. This is the more complex denial mechanism, not for the inexperienced. Ways of doing this include justifying violence against civilians due to the foreign policy of our allies, claiming that violence and hatred directed against us are the result of us not meeting moral standards such as equality or anti-racism.
4) Just pull your covers back over your head and go back to sleep. Hope someone else will deal with it while you pontificate or put your morals first.
"A HATE fanatic has boasted that Muslims will one day conquer Britain — by having more BABIES"
The only thing in the Sun newspaper I'd believe is the telly page
I don't even believe that without checking in at least one other publication.
Anyway back on topic.
All muslims are terrorist loving extremists, who want nothing more than to force our wimmin to wear burkhas and chop off the hands of all thieves*.
All couloured people are gun toting rapper drug dealers who want to rape our wimmin.
All Jews are money grabbing, big nosed freaks who secretly run all the worlds governments and financial institutions, and want to steal our beautiful wimmin such as Ms Goody.
All priests have a not so secret love of little children, and happily cover for each other.
Anyone on benefits is a dirty scrounger who has 15 kids and is milking the system.
Every adult on the internet is really there to try and lure kids into meetings for sex and chips.
All football watchers are hooligans looking for the next chance to have a riot.
All games make people violent, and all gamers are sociopathic murderers in training.
All "pro life" people go to abortion clinics and gun down the doctors
All Judges are fools with no qualifications for their job, and make up the rules as they go along.
I think all those statements are about as valid as that all muslims share the same views as those in the article.
I think the bnp are racist biggots, but part of me would like to see what they would do if they had any real power
So if there was a big clash between these 2 factions, would the decent innocent muslims in this country be on our side, or follow the extremeists ??
Blood terrorists..
Does it matter? non Muslims would still out number them something like 30 to 1...
If you think that just because there were only 100 in that room that is the sum of support for people like Choudray then you are very very naive.