It is a close call regarding thermos ultimate 900ml vs the Stanley master vacuum bottle 1300ml
I honestly think quad vac is not a sales gimmick or marketing rubbish, it does save heat compared to a normal double vacuum bottle, the reason why i say that is because from the results on the spreadsheet it is quite clear the master bottle vs the thermos ultimate, the thermos ultimate cannot out last the Stanley master bottle.
So i prefer the master bottle, the thermos ultimate is like a rabbit going fast and then gets tired whereas the master bottle is the endurance runner so to speak.
So yea what i am trying to say is that is this below.
Stanley master bottle results 0h 97c 6h 87c (3 degree difference when compared to thermos ultimate at 6 hours which is 84c so 87(master bottle) take away 83 (thermos ultimate) is 3c - 3 degree diffference) 12h 78c (5 degree difference)
thermos ultimate results 0h 97c 6h 84c 12h 73c
This degree difference between thermos ultimate and Stanley will get bigger and bigger over time which is what i think i hope that makes sense because the quadvac in Stanley is saving heat whiles the temperature goes down - i am open to what you think about this if this is rubbish let me know please.
So degree difference between thermos and Stanley master bottle could be like 7 degree difference at 18 hours or like 12 degree difference at 24 hours to be approximate so the master bottle drops more and more slowly over time which is why i call this bottle the endurance runner.
Anyways, for people who can afford and want the very best that i know of it has to be the master bottle.
For people on a budget it has to be the thermo cafe it has more bang for buck when compared to the thermos ultimate, regarding heat retention per £/$ so to speak.
This image direct from officially from Stanley them self's backs up the heat difference that i am talking about but compares to the Stanley classic bottle not the thermos ultimate but same thing i think.
If this is rubbish please let me know.
Dan.