Argument from incredulity - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Sorry no comment
Ok, I'll go with the simple tick box way of doing it.Can I remind everyone that on 7 September 2021, Then PM BJ announced the introduction of a Health and Social Care Tax.
By increasing NI by 1.25% (13.25% total) rom 6 April 2022 and for a separate tax to start in April 2023 to tax people a futher 1.25% to address the funding crisis in the sector.
This broke the tory manifesto of not raising taxes, but BJ insists that it was required. "we cannot shirk the challenge of putting the NHS back on its feet"
manifesto: https://www.conservatives.com/our-plan/economy
back bench anger: https://www.theguardian.com/politic...d-tory-anger-over-manifesto-breaking-tax-rise
Then backbencher Hunt said "social care does not actually get as much money as it needs."
Social care won't get money it needs, warns Jeremy Hunt
The Conservative former health secretary tells MPs there is a risk the NHS will "gobble up" all the funds.www.bbc.co.uk
7 months later; November 2022, This was reversed by Kami Kwarteng stating, "Taxing our way to prosperity has never worked"
National Insurance rise to be reversed in November
The 1.25% rise will be reversed from 6 November and a levy to fund health and social care will be axed.www.bbc.co.uk
in November 2023, now Chancellor Hunt in the "Autumn Statement for growth" announced a 2p cut to NI in January 2024.
The uk entered a recession late 2023 before the NI cuts took place.
What is a recession and how could it affect me?
A recession means the UK economy has shrunk for two three-month periods - or quarters - in a row.www.bbc.co.uk
Now two days ago, during the spring budget, Chancellor Hunt cuts NI by 2% again...
Budget 2024: Jeremy Hunt cuts National Insurance again as election looms
But Labour says many people will still be worse off because of existing freezes to income tax bands.www.bbc.co.uk
So in the space of less than 2 and a half years... the same party that was predicting gloom and doom for the future of our health service unless we start to pay an extra 3%+ now thinks that we can pay 4% less and it will be fine.
Please tick all that applies...
[ ] they have found a magic money tree
[ ] they make **** up as they go along
[ ] they don't care about the billions of people that need the NHS nor the future of social care
[ ] it's an election year
[ ] they are salting the battlefield before losing the war.
[ ] other, please explain:
other, please explain:
Think about it DanThey should never have put it up in the first place it was a dumb thing to do then, and the right thing to do to reverse that and now cut it further.
Think about it Dan
Remember the other forum ?I have thanks. I was against the new health and social care tax rise in 2021.
Remember the other forum ?
Rigged replies you have to tick the box to all the questions, would be my take on itSorry you've lost me.
How would you fund the black hole in health and social care?I have thanks. I was against the new health and social care tax rise in 2021.
Sorry you've lost me.
Rigged replies you have to tick the box to all the questions, would be my take on it
If you look at what you have asked us to do and the current feeling of the country I would answer by ticking every single box and I would assume most here wouldhuh?? He's lost me... and I wrote the darn thing... LMAO...
How would you fund the black hole in health and social care?
So the 5th largest economy in the world can’t afford half decent public services wow the world is screwed!1. Growth
2. If no growth then we have to live within means, and that means no improvement in services
You could be right of course, I was just pointing out that there are other factors aswell
So you wouldn't blame it on the Soviet Unions invasion as a factor? Or any other external problem that we had no control over that impacted our economy?
1. Growth
2. If no growth then we have to live within means, and that means no improvement in services
In 2020 during Covid when I had nothing to do, I thought I'd take a look at my pension fund.
I had never really given it a second thought before. It is a defined contribution employer scheme where the funds are taken salary sacrifice, and the provider they chose to run it picked the funds it was invested in, on what they term a 'lifestyle' profile, which means that initially its more invested in stocks and shares, then as you approach retirement age it switches over to safer assets.
Anyway, I looked into the growth I'd had over the 16 ish years Ive been in the scheme, and where it was invested. I was not happy with what I found.
There was a very high proportion of UK equities. I found out that many 'default' funds have this, because the logic was its a UK scheme, for UK employees, and that meant that those people favour UK bias. This immediately seemed crazy to me, as the US has experienced much higher growth. Why would you favour UK equities over faster growing US equities with the US being the biggest economy in the world?
Inheritance tax is just another tax on the less well off. Its designed to keep people in their place, cant have to many up and commers entering the sphere of the North Norfolk Holiday yaaaaah team.