net riddle

kaiowas · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:21

Originally posted by Cemetery
Not really no tis the last 3 I am 'unsure of' though that said am only certain of the 1st 2, 98% certain of the 3rd

3rd one is simple - very similar to the first
5th one is pretty complicated although I gave a decent clue earlier in the thread.

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:26

Aye have read clue & am not really closer...help me

kaiowas · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:28

You want the answer don't you

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:30

There are two ways of answering that, the short one is yes

kaiowas · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:31

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:36

Hmmm was 25 out.

What are the last 3? am guessing the last one isn't 101?

simisker · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:38

Originally posted by Cemetery
There are two ways of answering that, the short one is yes

Seconded, dammit!

Kaiowas: so that 'gaps-between-gaps' clue [thanks, btw

] was for sequence no. 5, not seq no. 6? No wonder I'm still brainfarting over 6, then!

These *are* all logical number sequences, aren't they?

Dammit.

[EDIT: 286? But doesn't that mean that the last one is more than two digits??! Oh well - I'll run with it - I'm just happy to be here!]

kaiowas · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:39

11
19
12
1
108
135

simisker · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:42

Originally posted by kaiowas
11
19
12
1
108
135

Right, so the short, sharp lesson there is 'disregard the number of question marks'...

Hey-ho. thanks, mr k!

kaiowas · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:45

Originally posted by simisker

Kaiowas: so that 'gaps-between-gaps' clue [thanks, btw ] was for sequence no. 5, not seq no. 6? No wonder I'm still brainfarting over 6, then!

Nope sorry - I've realised that there were 6 when I thought there were 5. The gap between gaps bit applies to the last one.

1) Prime Numbers
2) Alternate odd numbers
3) Primes + 1
4) Not sure but the answer was 1
5) Multiples of 9 (1,2,4,7,12) where the multipliers are separated by primes (possibly dodgy reasoning but it works

)
6) Differences (2,20,32,38) increase by smaller multiples of 6 (18,12,6)

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:45

lol thought clue was for the final one, but had number 5 already

although nope, had 99 for 5th one...ah well balls to it

onwards & upwards hopefully

cheers m8.

simisker · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:54

1.9 - Genius!

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 22:58

Agreed

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:33

k what is wrong with this for 1.11 (email if ya wanna lessen spoilers in thread

) Cannot see where it is wrong :/

OWKCNFETMAMLKTPS

/hangs head in shame

Garp · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:34

this 1.9 has me stuck!

moss · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:36

Originally posted by Cemetery
k what is wrong with this for 1.11 (email if ya wanna lessen spoilers in thread ) Cannot see where it is wrong :/

OWKCNFETMAMLKTPS

/hangs head in shame

having the same problem, i tried dr infront of the mlk which didnt help
:confused:

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:37

Originally posted by moss
having the same problem, i tried dr infront of the mlk which didnt help

I tried jn after

Garp, read the ENTIRE page.

simisker · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:40

Originally posted by Cemetery
k what is wrong with this for 1.11 (email if ya wanna lessen spoilers in thread ) Cannot see where it is wrong :/

OWKCNFETMAMLKTPS

/hangs head in shame

Nah, it's counter-intuitive, but for the question that requires a numerical answer, you use the number, NOT the first letters of each number...

Garp · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:46

Originally posted by Cemetery
I tried jn after

Garp, read the ENTIRE page.

Oh for pities sake!

Sheesh that really is a bit of a *******

Cemetery · 19 Mar 2003 at 23:48

Originally posted by simisker
Nah, it's counter-intuitive, but for the question that requires a numerical answer, you use the number, NOT the first letters of each number...

I tried that but it still didn't work :confused: