[TW]Fox;29332034 said:Good choice, the A5 would have been total garbage, as a car it predates the previous model A4 let alone the current one. They've been flogging that now thoroughly dead horse since 2007!
The new A4 will be a far better car than the A5.
For the deal it's really impossible not to say that that's a cracking deal, and a great car for the price.
It depends on the next and the next car.. I assume as the scheme goes on depreciation and OP still has the say to which car they get each time.
Only issue I can see is that it's a company car and mr tax man would see that as such. Even if you paid towards it.
Does that mean it's not considered a taxable benefit?
Does that mean it's not considered a taxable benefit?
Same as JLR. The employees buy the car with a credit deal that means xyz a month, then handed back at end of term with the car value covering the remaining credit - unless they opt to buy it outright. Its never a company car, hence no tax.
Same as JLR. The employees buy the car with a credit deal that means xyz a month, then handed back at end of term with the car value covering the remaining credit - unless they opt to buy it outright. Its never a company car, hence no tax.
For £200 a month what kind of down payment is that and mileage? Lease prices are hugely dependant on those factors.
The fact they buy the car, isn't why there is no tax liable. Otherwise motor corps would be selling cars at 50% off in their packages to attract/keep talent.