New samsung at last 1080p on a 32"

I would recommend a 40" Pana plasma...

Depends on budget but I would avoid 37" panels since they may use an inferior panel than what you would get on a 40"...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
@ that chart...who has a TV with a 120" screen size? :o

I used the chart ages ago to help decide on whether a 92" or slightly bigger projector screen would be best suited, so having up to 120" is very useful.

I'm glad someone posted that images, it really is important to consider viewing distance before deciding on 1080p v 720p.
 
Last edited:
Based on average eyesight. Some people will be able to tell the difference from a furthr distance, Id like to think I could with my glasses on.

You'd like to think, but image processing also comes into it.

I'd love to see most folks tell the difference between a 720p Kuro and a 1080p Panasonic. I think you'd struggle. However, if you did decide you had a preference then I bet you'd pick the Kuro without knowing it.
 
[DOD]Asprilla;11598085 said:
You'd like to think, but image processing also comes into it.

I'd love to see most folks tell the difference between a 720p Kuro and a 1080p Panasonic. I think you'd struggle. However, if you did decide you had a preference then I bet you'd pick the Kuro without knowing it.

Does it have a Kuro or Panasonic axis on that thing then? :P If TV processing comes into why wouldn't eyesight anyway. Your right though, close to impossible to tell from a distance with good sets.

I just meant a difference in the detail, of course that doesnt mean the TV with more detail would actually be better, ie LCD would have more detail my Samsung 40M87 looks far more details than my parents 37Px70 but I know the panny is a better picture, doesnt loose resolution as much when moving and the colours are far more natural.

You can have better vision than 20/20 aswell
 
Does it have a Kuro or Panasonic axis on that thing then? :P If TV processing comes into why wouldn't eyesight anyway. Your right though, close to impossible to tell from a distance with good sets.

;)

Yeah I didn't explain myself very well.

I was trying to make the point that everyone gets carried away with pixels (same as the do with cameras) when there are other equally important fascets that affect how good we perceive the image to be.
 
Another thing to consider is, No 32" LCD has 720 pixels, so all 720p stuff has to be upscaled to 768 (most of the time) so you lose some sharpness. Where as 1080p screens are actually 1080, so no scaling is needed.
 
Back
Top Bottom