The fact that efficiency drops below 70% at higher flow rates is neither here nor there.
And while it does cause a dip in torque at the top end, it is still a huge amount of torque and beats the spec requirement by Katech
Were the engine to be prototyped I would not expect it to fail to meet the required HP/torque targets nor to fail emissions as all the figures look good
I just LOL'd when I read you actually claimed you had boost from idle... serious, what?! Huge amount of torque ? Well I guess thats what 8L Excel engines give you.
The torque falling might be due to that turbine inlet pressure thing i was hinting at...... The heating of the charge also is an issue when you use an intercooler so the 70% does raise an issues as it will start to effect that Y axis value as you present more charge air restriction.
So you dont expect the introduction of a cat big enough to deal with your silly sized (from that crackpot uni again?) theoretical engine to effect this theorised flow?
This will obviously not end so I am stating now I wont be bothering to reply in relation to these points. I do not want you to interpret it as me relenting to your superior 'knowledge', more for the sanity of the thread.
