I can deny it because if there was an incoming brown dwarf on a 3500 year orbit due to pass through Earth's orbit in 2012 I would be able to see it myself by now, without a telescope.
Jeez, this isn't advanced science. How the hell could this world government (which doesn't even exist) hide a brown dwarf in space?
If this conspiracy existed and if it was capable of hiding the light and mavity of a brown dwarf, there still wouldn't be a problem because then they'd had the technology to push it out the way.
This would be a joke as a plot for a B-grade sci-fi film, let alone as reality.
A brown dwarf close enough to be on a 3500 year orbit and to cross Earth's orbit in 2012 would by now be the third brightest object in the sky, after the sun and a full moon. Brown dwarfs don't only emit infrared. They also emit in the visible light spectrum. Much less, certainly, but some. Far more than enough to make one visible to the naked eye if it was close enough to be getting here by 2012 on a 3500 year orbit.
Even if you ingore that, the inconvenient fact of mavity remains. If there was a brown dwarf within 4000 AU, it could be detected easily by mavity alone. 4000 AU is more than 100 times further out than Pluto.
Put simply - it isn't there. No end of people have been looking for it for decades. It's not there. It doesn't exist. It could not be concealed if it did exist.
By the way, that 1983 finding you mentioned was looking at far more distant objects. Some luminous gas clouds in our own galaxy, some other galaxies. That's one problem with single observations from a single point in space - you can't immediately tell if you're looking at a weaker, closer source or a stronger, more distant source. The astronomers, of course, said that explicitly and, of course, were ignored by conspiracy believers desperate for some some data they could pretend propped up their faith.
Unsurprisingly, the astonomers kept looking. They published their results:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/n...J...290L...5H&db_key=AST&high=3ccf23290006822
Orbit of Planet X (Nibiru)
![]()
As would the observation errors that astronomers noted decades ago.
Those deviations in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus? They're not real. They were observational errors introduced by less sensitive equipment. Astronomers noticed that a very long time ago.
Besides, there's a big difference between a Mars-sized planet 100AU out (which might possibly exist) and a brown dwarf that's going to hit the Earth in 2012 (which can't possbly exist unless it's being teleported in a couple of years from now).
Even disregarding that ridiculous 'Planet X' orbit, how many planets are there beyond Earth's orbit?![]()
its not going to hit, its passes by neptune but the sheer mass of it will greatly effect our puny planet
That's bull. The sun would affect it's orbit passing that close!
its not going to hit, its passes by neptune but the sheer mass of it will greatly effect our puny planet
its not going to hit, its passes by neptune but the sheer mass of it will greatly effect our puny planet
why does the Vatican have one of the worlds most powerful infrared telescopes?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Advanced_Technology_Telescope
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_is_the_most_powerful_telescope_on_the_earth
What are they looking for GOD?
why does the Vatican have one of the worlds most powerful infrared telescopes?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Advanced_Technology_Telescope
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_is_the_most_powerful_telescope_on_the_earth
What are they looking for GOD?