NIP

jon333 · 4 Sep 2025 at 18:16

So helpful some you, not. Tell me something I don't know. It was unmarked cop car with tinted windows. Not something I do normally, but he was driving really slow. Probably to encourage me to be stupid. Can anyone give me a reasonable answer to my question, or am I just going to get smart ass comments?

Kenai · 4 Sep 2025 at 18:20

jon333 said:
Can anyone give me a reasonable answer to my question, or am I just going to get smart ass comments?

jon333 said:
Can anyone tell me the penalty for driving a mechanically propelled vehicle in a public place without reasonable consideration to other users

ci_newman said:
Driving a mechanical vehicle without reasonable consideration is known as careless driving and carries a penalty of 3 to 9 penalty points, a discretionary disqualification, and a fine of up to £5,000. Minor incidents may result in a fixed penalty notice (FPN) with 3 points and a £100 fine, or an offer of a Driver Improvement Course to avoid points. In more serious cases or if the fixed penalty is rejected, you will be summoned to court for sentencing, according to AH Solicitors.

Mr Badger said:
Google says:

"Driving without reasonable consideration for other users can result in a fixed penalty of 3 penalty points and a £100 fine. However, the offence can also be prosecuted in court, leading to 3 to 9 penalty points, a discretionary driving ban, and a fine of up to £5,000. The severity of the penalty depends on the nature of the incident and the specific circumstances of the driving."

Bad signs would presumably be if the driving caused or nearly caused an accident and whether the case is going to be prosecuted in court.

What was wrong with these perfectly good responses, right at the start of the thread?

mattyfez · 4 Sep 2025 at 18:40

jon333 said:
Probably to encourage me to be stupid.

If you can be encouraged to be stupid, that's on you, lol.

Take your fine and learn from it.

sigma · 4 Sep 2025 at 19:24

Perhaps an anger management course is needed?

sigma · 4 Sep 2025 at 19:24

Terminal_Boy said:
Were you in possession of a patriotic flag or bacon at the time of the offence?

Do you throw bacon at Muslim people?

Scania · 4 Sep 2025 at 20:12

Well, at least you haven't tried to avoid paying tax on a house purchase....

mattyfez · 4 Sep 2025 at 20:25

Scania said:
Well, at least you haven't tried to avoid paying tax on a house purchase....

I'd have thought with a username like Scania, you'd be the last person to be turning a blind eye to drivers pulling in front of you and reducing your safe braking distance? :cry:

Scania · 4 Sep 2025 at 22:11

mattyfez said:
I'd have thought with a username like Scania, you'd be the last person to be turning a blind eye to drivers pulling in front of you and reducing your safe braking distance?

It's a daily occurrence in my line of work - unfortunately.

Gepetto · 4 Sep 2025 at 22:22

jon333 said:
Can anyone give me a reasonable answer to my question, or am I just going to get smart ass comments?

The police will send the Offence Report to an admin centre where it will be uploaded and a decision will be made on the penalty and you will be written to.

I believe that (in Essex at least) that would result in a Course Offer, or, if you've had a Course within the last 3 years it will be a fine and points.

I had to take a Course a few years ago and the cost was £175 but no points on my licence. I could have taken a £100 fine and 3 points if I had wanted to.

It's just a minor traffic offence.

SilverTongue · 4 Sep 2025 at 22:27

jon333 said:
So helpful some you, not. Tell me something I don't know. It was unmarked cop car with tinted windows. Not something I do normally, but he was driving really slow. Probably to encourage me to be stupid. Can anyone give me a reasonable answer to my question, or am I just going to get smart ass comments?

First day on the internet?

Also welcome to OcUK, where asking questions where you admit to having been a bit of a silly sausage will earn you the ribbing that you deserve for being a silly sausage

Quartz · 4 Sep 2025 at 22:57

dcsarge said:
@Quartz I genuinely don't see how having a dashcam could disprove it. Sounds like it would be a video confession .

There are cases where you can legally undertake and showing that the police were driving excessively slowly would demonstrate that this was one such case.

mattyfez · 4 Sep 2025 at 23:02

Quartz said:
There are cases where you can legally undertake and showing that the police were driving excessively slowly would demonstrate that this was one such case.

There's merging when there's safe space to do so, and there's cutting people up... we don't know which is which, but presumably the dash cam in the police car will show it quite clearly, hence the NIP.

dcsarge · Friday at 12:56

Quartz said:
There are cases where you can legally undertake and showing that the police were driving excessively slowly would demonstrate that this was one such case.

Fair enough but I think the key point will be proof of excessively slow speed, which as you say would require a dash cam. The OP says the traffic was slow moving, so I imagine it would be hard to justify.

Just about to hit the order button on a dash cam for new can next week, fed up of red light ignoring loonies and people who can't keep in lane

.

Nasher · Friday at 13:38

I'm sure AI can whip some footage up.