Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,415
Doesn't matter how innocent a person is proven or how absolute that proof is, there will always be people who'll swear blind that person is guilty as all hell.
So you don't care if she is actually guilty or not, you just want her to be found guilty?
What exactly are you implying?
No, I think he's implying the evidence may not be so concrete and they simply brought these charges to tally their crime stats.
Strange perspective to hold, considering the crimes and suspect involved, which is why I sort clarification.
A stitch up obviously
Same. a lot of circumstantial evidence but not a lot with weight imo.I'm expecting a not guilty verdict. No direct evidence and the circumstantial evidence seems flimsy.
But that's how GD rolls, no place for facts in here. It's quite shocking in here at the moment to be fair.All I'll say is I've been involved with 3 cases that were National News and went on for weeks, I've also been involved with several that went on for ages but didn't make the National News.
In all cases I sat back and read peoples posts on Social media, one on here, and just thought you know nothing, all you've heard is tiny little snippets from hours and hours of courtroom evidence.
I'll reserve judgement on this.
I read a lot of the evidence produced and although not the full story I didn't think it painted a picture of a murderer of babies. In fact a lot of the evidence I read just suggested that something was going on that a scapegoat could have been easily made. If I was on the jury I wouldn't be able to find this women guilty (But I doubt I saw all the evidence!)
As for life after, agreed she is finished, but if she does get found not guilty it shouldn't be like that. She should be able to work again and ideally she should be able to go back to her old job!!!
Supposedly there were lots of sewage leaks that were not fixed in that unit because the hospital was falling apart due to lack of funds.What explains the deaths if it wasn't her?
What explains the deaths if it wasn't her?
What explains the deaths if it wasn't her?
I never said she was guilty. Sewage doesn't explain injections of air or fluid into babies.
On the News now -
Nottingham maternity inquiry to examine 1,700 cases in largest baby deaths probe
Inquiry chair Donna Ockenden has previously criticised the hospital trust for failing to properly consult ethnic minority familieswww.independent.co.uk
The CPS prosecute roughly on two basis, one is "is there a realistic chance of conviction", the other is "is it in the public interest".No, he's saying he hopes that the CPS would only have proceeded to trial if there was strong evidence, rather than just to pad out their stats as it seemed was being implied.
I'm kinda surprised how little coverage in the news this story garnered.
I've been trying to get my partners daughter to come forward for this enquiry. She was at QMC for her birth and it was more than shocking. Absolute negligence that has left her with physical issues going forward, after they nearly permanently paralysed her with a botched epidural and subsequent botched attempts to fix it. Lack of post natal care for her and the baby and just a general unacceptable level of care.
But she's the type that doesn't want to make a fuss and tbh, it left her quite traumatised and she doesn't want to keep reliving it through an enquiry.