They are allowed to though, same as no one stops me posting in an AMD related thread. The key thing to remember is to just be respectful of other peoples opinions and not start to derail threads with the same old rhetoric.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
nVidia G-Sync Q&A with Tom Peterson
- Thread starter Gregster
- Start date
They are allowed to though, same as no one stops me posting in an AMD related thread. The key thing to remember is to just be respectful of other peoples opinions and not start to derail threads with the same old rhetoric.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
Agreed!
I stayed on topic so yeah. I have given valid points. Not my fault am not falling over backwards for this.
AMD to Celebrate 30 Years of Graphics: Webcast and new product reveal.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18617774
20 of the comments on the first page of 30 comments are from NV users.
It goes both ways many times, so its a moot point.
You did yeah, but now you've justified why you don't want/like the tech (again
) so don't need to state that again mate. I'm not having a go or even aiming this at you either, its just theres a lot of members on the forums who end up in a cyclical argument in each thread where their opinions clash and they never agree to disagree. Its what makes this sub forum have the reputation it does on arguments.That is the comment you made, do not respond as if you were saying something else in the first place.
As far as trolling its all a matter of opinion depending on the person, i dont see any real trolling in that thread and neither this one.
Last edited:
AFAIK the lag introduced at 144hz is not just with CS:GO. ULMB is nice but after using GSYNC the tearing is very noticeable and @ 100 on the Swift it does not feel any snappier than GSYNC. At less than 100 it's simply too dark for BF4.
It's also worth noting that renderframesahead 1 and adjusting the pooling rate to 1000hz are necessary to get the most out of the Swift.
It's also worth noting that renderframesahead 1 and adjusting the pooling rate to 1000hz are necessary to get the most out of the Swift.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
May I ask what other games you have noticed effected with lag?
Sure but I'm afraid that I'm rather boring and only play BF4. Initially when I got the Swift I thought ULMB was much better but after making the said tweaks I prefer GSYNC.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
I've tried roughly 60-70 different games on my gsync monitor and I've not noticed any added lag at all, especially when compared to vsync on.
I watched this interview yesterday while it was live. He was saying one thing but the slides were showing another. This was while talking about the lag. I don't know if the amount of lag will make that much difference in reality. And if it only happens when the fps exceeds 144 then it wont affect two many games anyway.
My concern about this would be with 60hz gsync monitors, there are a lot of games that will go over 60fps!!
Just as an aside, A few people on this forum solved their input lag and tearing problems by limiting their FPS to one below the frame rate of the monitor. And other members of the forum said this was bad. Now people have to limit the Fps when connected to a Gsync monitor and that's ok?
And I am still waiting for a comparison between a 144hz gsync monitor and a 144hz gaming monitor. I will want the same thing when freesync comes out.
Its very interesting tech though. For me I would love to see what its like for watching movies.
My concern about this would be with 60hz gsync monitors, there are a lot of games that will go over 60fps!!
Just as an aside, A few people on this forum solved their input lag and tearing problems by limiting their FPS to one below the frame rate of the monitor. And other members of the forum said this was bad. Now people have to limit the Fps when connected to a Gsync monitor and that's ok?
And I am still waiting for a comparison between a 144hz gsync monitor and a 144hz gaming monitor. I will want the same thing when freesync comes out.
Its very interesting tech though. For me I would love to see what its like for watching movies.
That is also wrong. It updates in under 7ms.
Yes as 120HZ is 8ms 144HZ will be slight less, they both say this later on so...
I assume (and would have thought you would) they are talking roughly for the sake of the video not scientifically working with 16ms and 8ms for 60HZ and 120HZ.
Aside from the unnecessary digs at AMD towards the end of the G-Sync segment a very good watch. Great to have official confirmation that surround will be supported soon. Would love three of those Swifts to replace my current VE278Q's, would have to add another 780 as well though. Could be an expensive time for peoples wallets 
Yes. But I like how Tom essentially said that if AMD's Adaptive Sync turns out to be 'better' than G-SYNC, Nvidia would reconsider what they are doing.
Either way I am quite fond of variable refresh rates and think they are a good thing for gamers. 
