Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes, but as long as fan company's products are expensive or better yet set at an elite price, then not only are the riffraff not able to buy them, but by extension those who do pay those elite prices are of course elite themselves...And of course the fanboys are fanboying for companies that rip them off.
Thats just the solder the chip under is made from a single piece of silicon.
Nvidia sell far more GPUs than AMD, why? Because they are seen as better products. If you don’t have the better product or atleast that perception in mindshare then you need to be cheap enough so that people are prepared to disregard the better product in favour of cost.Is it really? Are they losing money? Are their products stuck on shelves and not moving? Is AMD even earning enough from consumer graphics cards market to care, comparing to their enterprise market (without even mentioning CPUs, which sale very well)? Do they even produce enough consumer GPUs for the sale to be a problem? Their market share as per Steam statistics hasn't changed in many years now, it's always about the same.
By the 10th gen Intel was offering a 10 core CPU for $500 instead of the $1000 they were previously asking for 10 cores when ryzen first launched so the competition did make a difference. Would Intel have done this in a world without Ryzen?And did that force Intel to lower their prices and offer better product for less? Not so much currently, is it? They simply do their Intel thing and still rely on the branding a lot.
Welcome to the internet my friend. 90% disappointment, 10% ehhhh.Well opening this thread was disappointing, I was expecting a new feature or a drop in card prices.
But no. Thread title turned out to be clickbait.
That is my point, though. Brand matters a lot and it takes a very long time to change the mind of buyers. Which is also why it takes a long time for AMD to gain server market share too, even though their CPUs are considerably better. This is also one of the reasons AMD doesn't lose market share amongst gamers, nor gain - they are consistently about the same % according to Steam statistics, over many years.Nvidia sell far more GPUs than AMD, why? Because they are seen as better products. If you don’t have the better product or atleast that perception in mindshare then you need to be cheap enough so that people are prepared to disregard the better product in favour of cost.
But did they offer a better CPU for a lower price than competition or simply just moved to about the same level?By the 10th gen Intel was offering a 10 core CPU for $500 instead of the $1000 they were previously asking for 10 cores when ryzen first launched so the competition did make a difference. Would Intel have done this in a world without Ryzen?
Original Zen is more than just consumer CPUs and it definitely wasn't monolithic in server CPUs, as it was a MCM consisting of what many call monolithic chaplets. Ergo, Zen 1 is based on chiplets, it's just not that visible in consumer CPUs.I think the first Zens are tricky depending if you're going by definition of the word 'chiplet' or as a design.
I think the original Zen was actually monolithic.
It got better as now it's about Zen based CPUs.Well opening this thread was disappointing, I was expecting a new feature or a drop in card prices.
But no. Thread title turned out to be clickbait.
Yeah, been on the Internet since the 90s and it hasn't got better in that respect..Welcome to the internet my friend. 90% disappointment, 10% ehhhh.
Could a bird flap its wings in a world without Ryzen?Would Intel have done this in a world without Ryzen?
Jensen starts looking down the back of the sofa.![]()
Microsoft regains title of world's most valuable public company from Nvidia
The computing giant is currently valued at £3.3trn (£2.6trn) - just ahead of its closest rivals Nvidia and Apple. It comes as tech companies battle over artificial intelligence products.news.sky.com
i get a feeling the leather jacket man has no motivation to produce gaming cards in present scenario, i too would have did the same, its perfectly rational behavior... theres just not going to be enough supply, gonna be a re-run of 2020