• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia preparing new Geforce with GK110

I'm not sure why I'm even bothered I game on a 51 inch plasma! and this tech is unlikely to ever make it across to TV's :(

Still great for those that can take advantage of it.
 
LtMatt said:
A bit of both.



How do you define nay saying? The point i made stands. What difference is it going to offer over vsync with a limit of 1fps below the sync limit, assuming you can maintain those fps? If you can't maintain those fps then i agree it could offer a nice benefit. The problem becomes how long will the reduced input lag make a difference when fps drops well below 60.



Happy to be proved wrong. :)
Click to expand...


...Matt. It's not the same thing. Even at 59FPS or whatever you're still waiting for the monitor to synchronise. They're still not in sync.
 
LtMatt said:
A bit of both.



How do you define nay saying? The point i made stands. What difference is it going to offer over vsync with a limit of 1fps below the sync limit, assuming you can maintain those fps? If you can't maintain those fps then i agree it could offer a nice benefit. The problem becomes how long will the reduced input lag make a difference when fps drops well below 60.



Happy to be proved wrong. :)

I agree it sounds promising, just like mantle. Need to wait and see though.
Click to expand...

Seriously Matt,I understand what you're saying just think it must be a lot bigger than what you boiled it down to
 
MjFrosty said:
...Matt. It's not the same thing. Even at 59FPS or whatever you're still waiting for the monitor to synchronise. They're still not in sync.
Click to expand...

I know my point was it has the same effect on input lag. If you can maintain the 59fps there will be reduced input lag and perfect smoothness with zero frame time variation and no stutter/judder.
 
oldestgregg said:
Youre not regretting the Dell already are you Greg?
Click to expand...

Not at all however, I would love to get one of these G-Sync monitors from what I have just seen.

andybird123 said:
no, no pricing today
Click to expand...

I will be keeping an eye on these. I could do with knowing.

Suarez7 said:
As long as it's not stupid I'm 100% getting one. Going to 144hz changed FPS gaming for me I have a feeling this will be even more noticeable going off the comments from Ryan and Linus and Rein.
Click to expand...

I have just come from a 120Hz monitor (or 3 of them) to a single 1440P monitor. Picture wise, the 1440P wins hands down but for smoothness, you can't beat 120Hz+ WhyScotty told me how to OC my monitor and it is now sitting at 84mhz, so not bad but before that at 60Hz, I got tearing in Bioshock Inf.

I forgot all about tearing and that was a slump of the shoulders but give me this G-Sync monitor at a fair price and 1440P please and I am in. DSR time for the Dell :D
 
LtMatt said:
I know my point was it has the same effect on input lag. If you can maintain the 59fps there will be reduced input lag and perfect smoothness with zero frame time variation and no stutter/judder.
Click to expand...


Well that's just the point there is still however many ms difference between frames. The screen is still having to refresh vertically whilst the GPU renders everything in realtime. It's never in full synchronisation. How this translates in terms of difference is obviously difficult to gauge.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom