• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA RTX 50 SERIES - Technical/General Discussion

OMD now they have spotted 5080s with missing ROPS

So it seems that all the models have been affected, Its stated that only 0.5% have been affected, question is how many owners have been checking, if everyone checked world over then I'm sure its way more than 0.5%

This will add to the delays bigtime, mass returns and recalls, ROP checking from the factory, add an extra 60 days, so will be 4 months till things get back to normal, thats June/July

what a faff of a launch
 
Imagine thinking a bunch of nerds wouldn't notice this or would notice it and not care about 5% drop in performance. Have you... met pc gamers? Ever?

Much, much cheaper for Nvidia to get buyers who bother to check, to return them and get a replacement/refund, rather than recall the entire series.
 
Last edited:
And you have some in the RDNA4 upset at why shouldn't AMD be charging £700+ for the 9070XT.

Bizarre or what :cry:
What's the betting AMD tries to make a joke about ROPS during their reveal.
Much, much cheaper for Nvidia to get buyers who bother to check, to return them and get a replacement/refund, rather than recall the entire series.
The majority will never bother to check or even would be unlikely to notice missing ROPS anyway.
 
Last edited:
My guess is they knew. But they also know how strong their mindshare is. Those who notice it will get a replacement. My guess is most won't notice.

Their mindshare has been strong since at least 970 GTX days. People were enraged at the 3.5gb issue. What did said people do? Get a refund, add more money on top and get a GTX 980 :cry:
I still have my 970, back then I just tried to make sure VRAM usage was kept to 3.5GB and below :cry:
Admittedly, I waited for AMD to launch their 300 series before buying, then bought a 970 since it performed a little better in the games I played.
Even with the 3.5GB issue, Maxwell was a peak Nvidia generation. The GPUs were priced so low I got spoiled and thought everything that came after it was too expensive.

This time, there is no redeeming factor for the 5000 series. One can forgive a problem or two on a cheaper product.
But having problems this bad with the GPUs themselves AND priced terribly even at MSRP AND low performance gains AND stock issues AND scalpers!?!

9l92o1.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TNA

Nitefly. This will be of interest. Think I will keep my 8 week old PSU 3.0 and get the new 3.1 H++ cable, which appearscto have a better leaf spring design in addition to all the othe 2 x 6 part. What do you reckon guys, 'new' H++ cable, or new cable and new power supply (again).

Thanks for sharing.

There are however several different pin types from different manufacturers of connectors and if you bought a bunch of these cables you would probably see a random assortment of each. Different people say different ones are better. I am 99% sure though that the specification does NOT recommend one over the other.

The most recent ATX 3.1 spec from November 2023 currently only expressly recommends two designs for the cable plug pins: ‘3-dimple’ and ‘4-spring’… alongside ‘equivalent’ designs. The inference is that ‘2-dimple’ designs are ‘less optimum’.

This has been revised a couple of times (you can check the revisions here). The spec has never required a type of pin.

Is it worth getting an ATX 3.1 PSU for the new ports? No one can confidently say but it's looking probabl those changes achieved diddly squat in resolving the melting issue. All they do is confirm the cable is seated correctly, not that the pins are making contact. Hilariously though, in that J2C video you can see they don't really even achieve that. To quote Der8auer "The sense pins are only sensing themselves therefore are sensless".

So far as adding redundancy goes, it is better (summary of changes in the first link above). Going H++ to H++ is the best option for a native 12v cable. But, it’s arguably best to just use a 4x 8-pin octopus adapter.

No revision has solved all of the issues though.

Also, even if we do determine that some cables are better than others, it doesn't really mean much. The lack of safety measures still means a flawed cable fails badly and causes lots of expensive damage/possibly a fire risk.

Yes, although I suppose (beyond the whole ‘600w down tiny wires’ headliner) it’s more a lack of safety / engineering on the PCB header end (GPU) that’s the next biggest issue.
 
Last edited:
I posted this to the AMD thread, I think it's relevant to 5070 Ti purchase decisions.

I'm using the most recent Videocardz leak of "official" AMD figures, comparing 9070 XT to 7900 GRE. Typing the figures into excel gives slightly different figures to the article headline:

Non-RT average: +37.4%
RT average: +53%

If we use the most recent set of graphs from the Techpowerup MSI 5070 Ti Ventus review, the 9070 XT will look something like this:

average-fps-3840-2160-9070-XT.png
relative-performance-rt-3840-2160-9070-XT.png


So who would switch sides if the 9070 XT was £600? How much more is the 5070 Ti worth? Is the 5070 non-Ti DOA if the 9070 XT is £550?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom