* OcUK 3D MARK 06 TOP-LIST (V4.0) *

sulli · 8 Dec 2007 at 07:39

New Score submited

marc2003 · 8 Dec 2007 at 08:07

[ZiiP]carrot;10639644 said:
Well 4624 on my first go round, need to try and get that P4 at 4ghz, and actually overclock the graphics lol

mother flipper. you've taken my single core crown.

scores updated.

marc2003 · 8 Dec 2007 at 08:10

edgedemon said:
There is obviously something seriously wrong

My score came in at 5976..

check your nvidia driver settings are at default and that you have the latest chipset drivers for your mobo installed.

sulli · 8 Dec 2007 at 08:17

wahey back at the the top for duel core/ single card

Thanks for the swift update marc

VaderDSL · 8 Dec 2007 at 11:02

Cheers for the update, 11355 sound ok for an OC 8800GTS 320mb?

IamMed · 8 Dec 2007 at 14:25

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4081641

E4300 @ 3.2ghz
3850pro @ 750/1004

3DMark Score 10545 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 4453 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 4831 Marks
CPU Score 2779 Marks

marc2003 · 8 Dec 2007 at 17:10

sulli said:
wahey back at the the top for duel core/ single card

well that didn't last long....

3DMARK 06 DUAL CORE / SINGLE CARD

1....14940 | Vogon | intel e6600 @ 3798mhz | nvidia 8800ultra 768mb @ 720/2430
2....14912 | Sulli | intel e6850 @ 3960mhz | nvidia 8800gtx 768mb @ 711/1101

which one of you two is going to kill your hardware first?

Vogon · 8 Dec 2007 at 18:34

Me probably, my cpu hasn't the legs on Sulli's

tatts · 8 Dec 2007 at 21:10

Submitted my score with a Inno 3D 8800GT OC @ stock speeds, will re-test when i get my waterblock and can o/c it further

is 11784 any good for a E6400 @ 3.4ghz :confused:

marc2003 · 8 Dec 2007 at 21:13

VaderDSL said:
Cheers for the update, 11355 sound ok for an OC 8800GTS 320mb?

tatts said:
is 11784 any good for a E6400 @ 3.4ghz

take a look at the scores just above and below what you're getting. that's the whole point of this, so you can compare scores.

also you can use the futuremark ORB comparison thingy too.

VaderDSL · 8 Dec 2007 at 21:13

marc2003 said:
take a look at the scores just above and below what you're getting. that's the whole point of this, so you can compare scores.

also you can use the futuremark ORB comparison thingy too.

yeah but ... like it's ... ok

edgedemon · 9 Dec 2007 at 00:59

marc2003 said:
check your nvidia driver settings are at default and that you have the latest chipset drivers for your mobo installed.

Hmmm
The nvidia drivers are 169.12, at default, I haven't changed anything. I have the latest dell drivers from their website, but dell are not hot on updating older models, these drivers are quite old now..

marscay · 9 Dec 2007 at 06:12

yay number 1 with the kentsfields ....for now

paradigm · 9 Dec 2007 at 11:22

Pushed down into 6th huh.

Guess I best pull my finger out and actually install XP.

Give me an hour or two

marscay · 9 Dec 2007 at 15:53

that was in Vista x64 btw

paradigm · 9 Dec 2007 at 15:55

I've given up with XP, its just godawful

What drivers were you on, the standard 7.11's?

marscay · 9 Dec 2007 at 16:14

the 3dmark06 run was with the crysis hotfix i think

i've since gone back to 7.11 because those crysis drivers suck for everything but crysis and maybe 3dmark, guess i should bench again wouldn't surprise if i get another boost.

marc2003 · 9 Dec 2007 at 16:57

updated.

twitch · 9 Dec 2007 at 18:53

Not bad for my little shuttle..

11531

Submitted

Mad_Jay · 9 Dec 2007 at 20:40

New score for me, now i have a Quad

14418

Q6600 @ 3.6
8800gt @ 725/1800/2000
Windows Vista

Competitor rules

***** OcUK 3D MARK 06 TOP-LIST (V4.0) *****

* OcUK 3D MARK 06 TOP-LIST (V4.0) *