• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***** OcUK 3D MARK 06 TOP-LIST (V4.0) *****

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you want to keep your old score on the chart when i do the next update, you'll need to submit it again because your new (duff) entry has over written it in the database. :p
 
244.jpg
 
will try and get a new score submitted marc, unfortunately i deleted my previous best of 14841, im having some driver probs at the minute, and cant get time to sort em, but gotta say great chart marc:)
 
Last edited:
14465 that will boost me a few spots.I cant go any more on air.and clocking my video card i wont for the few 100 i would get happy with that
 
Bah 4got my cpu speed pft.But looks better them few spots hgher. btw 3200/3198 if you want to add it for me ;)
 
Last edited:
Well, I gained about 2500pts from a 555mhz increase in CPU speed....shows how CPU bottlenecked crossfire 38xx cards are in 3dm06

3dmxo4.png
 
Wouldn't it just be the increase in the CPU score that would give you the main rise in your final score?

Yes you would have gained a few fps in the other tests but the CPU score would be the main reason.
 
Reality|Bites said:
Wouldn't it just be the increase in the CPU score that would give you the main rise in your final score?

Yes you would have gained a few fps in the other tests but the CPU score would be the main reason.
Click to expand...

Nope....look at my SM2/SM3 scores..they are waaay higher. That clearly shows the cpu was bottlenecking the cards in this test.

E6300 @ 3.2ghz
3DMark Score 14186 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 6327
SM 3.0 Score 7734
CPU Score 2711

E6750 @ 3.76ghz
3DMark Score 16729 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 7674
SM 3.0 Score 8581
CPU Score 3344
 
Yeah a pretty significant FPS difference in the graphics test...and a bit in the HDR test.

E6300
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 51.36 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 54.1 FPS
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.87 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 1.35 FPS
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 84.43 FPS
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 70.25 FPS




E6750
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 62.18 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 65.72 FPS
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.05 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 1.7 FPS
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 87.18 FPS
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 84.43 FPS
 
Would love to know your settings with those scores, is it the bios, as I have same board and a Q9300 clocked at 3.5ghz with a 3870x2 and a 3850 all at 850/1050 and I cant get anywhere that.
Or is this in XP, not sure on crossfire support in XP, know it dont support xfire x
I take that back, I read it wrong bleary eyed in the morning, I do get higher, thats still a great score for your rig though.
Hows the rampage bios, wonder if it would get over my FSB wall.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom