They might be alright jack but what about everyone who gave money to the kickstarter, are they actually going to get what they thought they were contributing to? If i were one of those people id be pretty concerned and ****** off right now.
Not sure why im bothering, but to be fair to Oculus, the kickstarter campaign backers got their DK1, but i still think when it comes down to the fact that they needed backing in order to make a game-changing product, and the people came and supported them and made it happen, for them to get half way through the process and then accept a big fat cheque from FACEBOOK!? Thats an insult, they owe those people better than that.
Would the Rift have died if those people didnt back it? Probably not, they'd have found someone to bankroll it, and those people would be getting a slice of the pie. But the people who have backed it, get a facebook post telling them, just hours after Oculus posted
"Today, we’re pleased to announce that we’ve joined forces with Facebook to create the best virtual reality platform in the world."
March 25, 2014 - 02:35 PDT
Then a few hours later we get
"I'm excited to announce that we've agreed to acquire Oculus VR, the leader in virtual reality technology."
Theres plenty of things you could call them both, and they'll all be turned into *'s by the forum!
Think everyone expected they'd be bought out eventually. But by someone like MS / Sony or some peripherals company like Logitech. but Facebook? Just strange.
MS or Sony, im not sure i'd have been too impressed with either (i've spent £800 on a Sony TV and Surface Pro 2 in the last few months) cos im not so sure how things would end up there either.
Logitech, if they sell a peripheral which does what i'd like as good/equal to other brands and sensibly priced, i'd pick them over any other company... not sure i'd want them with the Rift though, but i'd be relatively happy its with a company i like.
Im just surprised its not a Google purchase, it seems to fit in with exactly their sort of style, very technology orientated and if they're not leading the way they're probably trying to reinvent it. They're not the same, but with the Rift and Google glasses, they're not that different either and theres a decent cross-over without stepping on toes.
I suspect either Google have something they're already working on, or maybe they were in the mix but Facebook wanted it more because they're more desperate, like BT buying the broadcast rights for football, its a play for relevance.
But had i been given the choice of the last company i'd want getting their hands over this product, well it would have been EA
![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
but only because Facebook wouldnt have even occured to me. I absolutely HATE all this social media junk and the way it infests your life, not just your time on the internet. Everything has to have a facebook page, and a stupid hashtag for every occasion, so we can tweet what we think like they even give a damn!
Im sure plenty know
![RedFace :o :o](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/redface.gif)
but US tv shows encourage you to tweet about the ep to them "Should Dave lie to Pete? #whocares"
During NASCAR (i know, but i like it) they have people tweet/instagram (whatever!) photos of themselves watching the race called 'How do you KFC?'.
Does this nonsense really enrich peoples lives?? (not nascar
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)
)
Hate it, hate every bit of it, and Facebook pretty much lead the way in terms of kickstarting this movement. MySpace might have had the social bit before them, but it never infested our lives, every website having [like] and [tweet] buttons.
okay, now its gone 3am and im ranting
![Frown :( :(](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/frown.gif)