If you find certain jokes funny (think Sickipedia, Frankie Boyle type stuff), do you think that reflects on the sort of person you are?
Is it possible to appreciate a good 'offensive' joke for what it is (be it a play on words or clever with context) without believing in the subject matter? Or are the two linked on some level?
It would be silly to assume that anyone who found a joke about child molestation funny, for example, to be a pedophile wouldn't it? Then why do some people suddenly become offended when they hear a joke about it? Surely they realise it is just a joke and has no bearing on what is acceptable in real life or not?
Who needs to reassess their stance - the people who find the humor in bad taste but funny nonetheless or the people who can't differentiate between context and reality?
Is it possible to appreciate a good 'offensive' joke for what it is (be it a play on words or clever with context) without believing in the subject matter? Or are the two linked on some level?
It would be silly to assume that anyone who found a joke about child molestation funny, for example, to be a pedophile wouldn't it? Then why do some people suddenly become offended when they hear a joke about it? Surely they realise it is just a joke and has no bearing on what is acceptable in real life or not?
Who needs to reassess their stance - the people who find the humor in bad taste but funny nonetheless or the people who can't differentiate between context and reality?
Last edited:



