There was a cars width though.. If you’re on the outside in the wet you have to know a car might do that to you.Hamilton drifted wide and didn't leave him much space, still 50:50 for me.
Last edited:
There was a cars width though.. If you’re on the outside in the wet you have to know a car might do that to you.Hamilton drifted wide and didn't leave him much space, still 50:50 for me.
...???It's not called the red bull ring for nothing.
It's not called the Red Bull ring at allIt's not called the red bull ring for nothing.
Hamilton understeered into him, if anyone is at fault it's clearly him and it ruined Perez race so i don't think its that harsh even with the conditions in mind.
Hamilton understeered into him, if anyone is at fault it's clearly him and it ruined Perez race so i don't think its that harsh even with the conditions in mind.
It's not called the red bull ring for nothing.
its called sarcasmIt's not called the Red Bull ring at all
eh? - how have you possibly come up with that... You seen onboard footage that no one else has seen to determine the understeer??
Perez had bags of space so your point is null.Only a 5 second penalty for taking someone out of the race is pretty lenient. He went into the side of Perez and had loaddds of space.
Perez had bags of space so your point is null.
A penalty is given irrespective of the outcome. That is how it has always been. We know you do not like Lewis.Only a 5 second penalty for taking someone out of the race is pretty lenient. He went into the side of Perez and had loaddds of space.