Thanks for the replies.
I didn't raise CPU core because even at 380x6 (if I could manage that), it will be well underclocked. (I can reach 334x9 and be prime stable for 8hrs with Vcore at stock by the way).
I'm using BIOS 16b, and didn't see a reason to disable C1E & EIST, but will try, after all 367x6 is such a modest setting to get stuck at.
OK, after your replies I raised Vcore and disabled C1E & EIST and checked again and I can now run a little faster, so I'm a little confused. Why should it it be neccessary to raise core volts when the CPU is still so much under clocked? It's now at 3.475v (stock is 2.875), and I can just about get to 395Mhz, still at x6 and so underclocked.
I was hoping to be able to get stable at say 400x8 with modest over volts, my thinking was to drop the multiplier to x6 and keep upping the FSB to find the board limit, then with the muliplier at x8 find the CPU limit within that range and with comfortable temperature/volts.
Now it seems I'm having to increase the core volts without seeing any gain from the CPU, or is my thinking all wrong - if I find the volts that will allow a higher FSB at x6 also will that be good enough at x8?
Thanks for the tips, it seems I can now try to creep the FSB up a bit at a time, though I'm surprised to have to have upped core volts at this stage. Is this normal?