• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Official Bulldozer Reviews

//double-facepalm

Oh dear. Its such a bad showing for AMD that its not even worth trolling their fanbois. But actually this is just plain bad news for all of us. There wont be any price cuts from Intel, and development will go at a snails pace.

I guess I'll be running my 920 for a few more years...
 
:o

At this rate I think people would have been happier if AMD just 32 nanomized the Phenom and added another 2 cores at least.

Needless to say a massive disappointment. Intel must be loling so hard.

Hmm... I wonder what they are going to call their next processor?
 
:(

Anyone with a brain would mourn this day.I would love to see some good competition from AMD.Some of the best bits i have owned was the 2500 barton M chip which was a stonker and the 9800pro which was ati but ati are now amd so :o

8800 gtx and E6300 have been my other legendary purchases.It just goes in cycles perhaps in 4 years time we will see a design that warrants the FX logo.

Oh and the naming is hilarious that a bulldozer cannot demolish a sandy bridge... I think AMD are going to need a bigger bulldozer :p
 
Last edited:
Has anyone here had look today at the processors in the "clearance" section on the home page here. How does a P II 955 for £65 sound?
 
happy i chose 2500K over this few months ago, the voice in my head told me this is quite a fail product.
 
Quick read of the reviews and Bulldozer looks hopeless, it just doesn't have the performance and power consumption is way too high. It might have been competitive a year ago, but surely not today. Amazing how little advantage there is over the Phenom II given the extra development time and extra transistor count.

It's sad that they weren't able to deliver. I guess this is the beginning of the end of AMD as a major CPU manufacturer...

...unless the current PC architecture with powerful CPU itself is on its way out, to be replaced with lower power phones/tablets/laptops etc.

How's Bulldozer expected to work when you hook several thousand of them together in a supercomputer? For example, the third most powerful computer in the world (US DOE Jaguar) uses 224,162 AMD x86_64 Opteron x6 running at 2600 MHz.
 
Let's face it, these chips are disappointing, not terrible. They just don't quite match up to the sandy bridge chips. I'd guess you'd still be reasonably happy with the performance should you buy one. It's not like it's a pentium 2 chip or something :p

Erm, hello? You do realise that this is an internet forum and your down to earth attitude, along with your distinct lack of 'OMG it's completely the worst thing ever to happen', is not going to get you anywhere. No siree. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom