Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 8,263
- Location
- Cornwall
What I love on this forum is the cyclic nature of the arguments. By that I mean the way the same arguments keep coming up, often flipped between red and green teams.
First it'll be drivers. Team X is going through a good patch and Team Y isn't so Team X will bring up drivers a lot. Then it all switches and Team X goes quiet on drivers and Team Y becomes more vocal.
Then there's VRAM. When Team X has more VRAM than Team Y, Team X is always on about how A isn't enough VRAM for this resolution and you need at least B amount, which is what Team X has on their cards. Team Y dispute the fact and we get graphs flung back and forth. Then Team Y get cards with more VRAM and suddenly decide that that's how much VRAM you need for said resolution while Team X argue that's it's not because of blah...
Then there's reference coolers. Team X has a hot and noisy cooler while Team Y has cooler quieter cooler. Team X argue that GPU are fine to run hot it doesn't matter, plus fan speeds can be adjusted and they play games with headphones on. Plus 3rd party coolers will fix both issues (that apparently didn't matter anyway). Then Team Y's cooler either doesn't advance enough or goes backwards and Team X get a new reference cooler. Team X are then talking up how it's so good to have a cool and quiet reference cooler (apparently GPU now aren't supposed to run hot and people have stopped wearing headphones?) while Team Y are fan speeds can be adjusted and there are 3rd party coolers on the way...
Also Team X/Y will have someone with watercooled cards that solve all the issues anyway...
I'm sure there are, or will be, similar arguments with regards to display connectors and power efficiency too.
I realise without these arguments the GPU sub-forum would be almost inactive, but does anyone else look forward to when there's something else to discuss? Maybe we'll have VR soon?
We could argue about APIs soon, although that's sorta been done already...
TL;DR - Do we have to keep arguing about the same things? As with most 'discussions' nobody ever seems to change their mind.
First it'll be drivers. Team X is going through a good patch and Team Y isn't so Team X will bring up drivers a lot. Then it all switches and Team X goes quiet on drivers and Team Y becomes more vocal.
Then there's VRAM. When Team X has more VRAM than Team Y, Team X is always on about how A isn't enough VRAM for this resolution and you need at least B amount, which is what Team X has on their cards. Team Y dispute the fact and we get graphs flung back and forth. Then Team Y get cards with more VRAM and suddenly decide that that's how much VRAM you need for said resolution while Team X argue that's it's not because of blah...
Then there's reference coolers. Team X has a hot and noisy cooler while Team Y has cooler quieter cooler. Team X argue that GPU are fine to run hot it doesn't matter, plus fan speeds can be adjusted and they play games with headphones on. Plus 3rd party coolers will fix both issues (that apparently didn't matter anyway). Then Team Y's cooler either doesn't advance enough or goes backwards and Team X get a new reference cooler. Team X are then talking up how it's so good to have a cool and quiet reference cooler (apparently GPU now aren't supposed to run hot and people have stopped wearing headphones?) while Team Y are fan speeds can be adjusted and there are 3rd party coolers on the way...
Also Team X/Y will have someone with watercooled cards that solve all the issues anyway...
I'm sure there are, or will be, similar arguments with regards to display connectors and power efficiency too.
I realise without these arguments the GPU sub-forum would be almost inactive, but does anyone else look forward to when there's something else to discuss? Maybe we'll have VR soon?
We could argue about APIs soon, although that's sorta been done already...
TL;DR - Do we have to keep arguing about the same things? As with most 'discussions' nobody ever seems to change their mind.