***Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores***

[TheRealDeal]

Sorry didn't realise, and when I last came on and did this people were doing what resolution/details I have posted. 1680x1050 is too low tbh.

Yea my top resolution is 1920x1200. I done a few benches in the other thread at this resolution but to compare results we all need to use the same settings. Maybe we could have done 1680x1050 plus 4xaa as the must do default and for those that can do higher a comparison of 1920x1080 with 4xaa. the op is the man updting the thread though so its really up to him in this thread.

 

[xsistor]

No. Heaven is more of an nv benchmark as they are geared more towards tesselation power. Its 1xgtx460 almost matching 2x5870m's which are a little slower than a 5770.

Ah you mean 1 GTX 460 is approximately 5770 xfire. then yeah.

 

[TheRealDeal]

Ah you mean 1 GTX 460 is approximately 5770 xfire. then yeah.

Yea 1 gtx460 heavily overclocked will not be much slower than 2x5770cf

 

[RavenXXX2]

Sorry didn't realise, and when I last came on and did this people were doing what resolution/details I have posted. 1680x1050 is too low tbh. I will be back though lol.

Err why is too low, it's not much off 1080p and it's the most popular gaming res, it and AA is more than enough to work the cards, just looks at the results.

 

[Nelly]

6950 + Unlocked Shaders @ 950/1375

 

[mountaincow]

There is no point making the thread more complicated, this way we get more results from people who cannot do higher resolutions.
It's enough to provide consistent results.

 

[TheRealDeal]

Err why is too low, it's not much off 1080p and it's the most popular gaming res, it and AA is more than enough to work the cards, just looks at the results.

I think 1680x1050 with 4xaa is in the same ball park as 1920x1080 with no aa so yea pretty decent for comparing on this bench.

The reason i say this is my 6870 running the bench at 1920x1200 with no aa is giving slightly lower numbers than 1680x1050 with 4xaa.

 

[setter]

1680x1050 is a good choice for resolution, not everybody owns momitors with 19** or higher res. Gives more people a chance to add their results.

 

[Tikkabhuna]

Going for the lowest score. Its clocked at 900/1290. Oh yeah!

Edit: Since Nelly mentioned it I installed SP1. I think there must be something else going on here though.

 

[Nelly]

Suprised how many people not using Win 7 SP1, my mininum framerates in this benchmark went up by around 4fps, not much but still.

 

[Dash RipRock]

i7 920 oc to 3.8ghz (not 3.6 like the piccy says),2x gtx 580 default clocks




And 1680x1050 ...

 

[Moron]

2500k @ 4.5, and an ageing 5870 at 870/1220.



Re-ran with more agressive clocks, 890/1236, small improvement.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[chipps101]

Suprised how many people not using Win 7 SP1, my mininum framerates in this benchmark went up by around 4fps, not much but still.

i just let windows sort the updates out itself, so i imagine it'll install it one day soon when i switch the machine off

 

[tommybhoy]

Xfire 6950>70
Please note that driver series is: 8.821-110126a-112962C-ATI, NOT what is in the screenies, last night it was showing 'logmein mirror driver'. Mind boggling!

 

[mountaincow]

edit: Making this into a more useful post than it was!

w3bbo when you read this can you check and update my score please.

Thanks.

 

[tommybhoy]

@lollyhayes, I spotted your results, any chance you can oc your i5 and re do the test?
I am considering upgrading to i5 and was wondering how much gains I would get to see if it was worth the outlay.

 

[Dash RipRock]

i7 920 oc to 3.8Ghz (not 3.6),2 x gtx580 SLI

Extreme tess/8xAA/16xAF "Nvidia willy waving " mode

 

[Shayper]

Unfortunately every time I try 1680*1050 it crashes

 

[iTek]

The old trusty Q6600 running the 6970 @ stock, seems to be an okay score?

 

[RavenXXX2]

^^Need 4xAA enabled to compare with results in thread.