Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores

trisp · 21 Jul 2011 at 03:42

Well its been along time since i uploaded any new overclocks and i have changed to ati... (i apolgogise for the white bar lol)

Changed to ati two 6950s (not unlocked running at 950core/1500mem)

O and btw any chance u could label the unlocked and the locked 6950's ^^ as i see somepeople who either have amazing oc's on there 6950's or there unlocked... as scores in the list could/are missleading...

paradisiac · 21 Jul 2011 at 08:44

ok, my new score.
2xHD6850 CF @ 850MHz Core Clock
i5 2500k @ 4.8GHz

MeMeMeMe · 24 Jul 2011 at 01:17

My new build: 6950 2GB Crossfire, i7-2600k, all at stock

Jay85 · 24 Jul 2011 at 17:32

Ignore

New entry made.

blackninja · 24 Jul 2011 at 20:22

Update:

Added a twin fozr III 6950 for the hell of it

... this bench was with all three cards running at 1000/1450 but I don't see any scaling really above 950 core whereas with 2 cards I saw the effect of each 15MHz increment all the way to 1030 core .. bottleneck perhaps ?? (Am running unlocked 6950 @ 16x, unlocked 6950 @ 8x and the twin fozr 6950 @ 8x (which won't unlock))

Jay85 · 25 Jul 2011 at 01:49

852 core
1704 shader
4002 memory
VDDC 1.062V stable on this run

FMTopfan · 25 Jul 2011 at 10:36

blackninja said:
Update:

Added a twin fozr III 6950 for the hell of it ... this bench was with all three cards running at 1000/1450 but I don't see any scaling really above 950 core whereas with 2 cards I saw the effect of each 15MHz increment all the way to 1030 core .. bottleneck perhaps ?? (Am running unlocked 6950 @ 16x, unlocked 6950 @ 8x and the twin fozr 6950 @ 8x (which won't unlock))

The 6000-series have been excellent at scaling with two GPUs CF but expectations of similar results with three has always been slightly disappointing with most GPUs. For example; even if MeMeMeMe added another 6950 for a total of 3, he'd receive similar scores to yourself. Even so, I would be very happy with 2878 which is still huge!

Your 920 should be free of bottlenecking at clocks of 4GHz (below 3.7GHz there is definitely bottlenecking). If your curious to find out how your rig is managing: test at various game/bench settings with starting the clocks of the 920 at 3.3GHz and testing after each 100MHz increment until you reach 4GHz again, logging the min/max/fps for comparison. Post your findings if you get around to it.

rjk · 25 Jul 2011 at 12:19

NEW RESULTS UPDATE

second place overall by the looks of the current leaderboard.
this is a system I have been developing over the past week, obviously it is clocked a lot more than would be commercially available

same setup broke 50K in vantage this weekend too

got 3515 afterwards but forgot to save the thread

specs for the purposes of the thread are:
GTX 580 TRI SLI [cards sat at 900Mhz+ on the cores and about 2050 on the memory]
2600K @ 4.8GHz-5GHz depending on benchmark runs

Noel Gallagher · 27 Jul 2011 at 17:21

mrplou · 29 Jul 2011 at 06:24

6950 direct cuii and 6970 lightning at 950/1350.
Picked up 200 points by moving to a bigger case. Go figure!

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

ReAPeR101 · 29 Jul 2011 at 09:46

rjkoneill said:
second place overall by the looks of the current leaderboard.
this is a system I have been developing over the past week, obviously it is clocked a lot more than would be commercially available

same setup broke 50K in vantage this weekend too
got 3515 afterwards but forgot to save the thread

specs for the purposes of the thread are:
GTX 580 TRI SLI [cards sat at 900Mhz+ on the cores and about 2050 on the memory]
2600K @ 4.8GHz-5GHz depending on benchmark runs

Awesome score well done

FMTopfan · 29 Jul 2011 at 10:09

Hi rjkoneill. I wonder if the combination of the the 2600K (4.8GHz-5GHz) and tri-580s if the ceiling is with the Intel chip or the GPUs. Maybe they are an even match in your custom-rig?

paradisiac · 30 Jul 2011 at 17:06

GTX460 2GB

rubin1961 · 30 Jul 2011 at 17:54

i7 [email protected]
HD5970 stock
FPS:67.2
SCORES:1692
MIN FPS:28.2
MAX FPS:167.8

Is this ok

FMTopfan · 31 Jul 2011 at 04:47

rubin1961 said:
i7 [email protected]
HD5970 stock
FPS:67.2
SCORES:1692
MIN FPS:28.2
MAX FPS:167.8

Is this ok

Certainly is ok!

That is nearly 100 more points that I scored (1599) with my rig in sig oc'd - post a screenshot for proof rubin1961. No idea how you managed that on stock clocks and the ol' 920 at 3.6GHz. :confused:

rubin1961 · 31 Jul 2011 at 07:59

Sorry i havent a clue how to post screen shots

rubin1961 · 31 Jul 2011 at 08:27

I did another run this morning and now i get more so i dont know if there is anything wrong

FPS:67.7
SCORES:1705
MIN FPS:30.3
MAX FPS:169
I have saved the results

FMTopfan · 1 Aug 2011 at 00:44

rubin1961 said:
Sorry i havent a clue how to post screen shots

Don't want to sound too harsh but no use posting anymore typed results as they won't count. We only accept screenshots, no exceptions.

Time to stick this in first post for reference:
Using MS Paint or Irfranview, press printscreen button (next to scroll lock) on active window and paste into either one of your choice of image applications. Now crop image down and save. A better way is to use Irfranview and set a Capture key to capture a specific region which is option 3) Foreground window. This avoids the need to crop and is quicker. Tip: Save as JPG with 80% quality and upload to imageshack, etc.

Bilbocard · 1 Aug 2011 at 01:20

I scored 27! Did I win?

Clum · 1 Aug 2011 at 07:31

Pretty middle of the road for a single 580 @ 925/1850/2200, but here is mine anyway!

Competitor rules

***Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores***

Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores